Staff Reports
In the latest episode of “White House Shenanigans,” the Biden administration may be facing some serious questions about the legitimacy of preemptive pardons handed out in the wake of the January 6 riots. President Trump recently declared these pardons as “void” and “vacant,” raising eyebrows and suggesting implications of a possibly rogue autopen signing away presidential authority without the actual president’s knowledge. What a twist!
If the drama around this situation wasn’t rich enough, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt took a stand during a press briefing and challenged reporters to dig deeper. Champions of accountability should have a field day with this one. Leavitt urged the press to consider whether President Biden knew anything about these pardons, asserting that the autopen is the kind of tool you’d expect from an administration that can’t seem to get its act together—after all, it’s not like a “signature” should come with an *assist* from a machine.
Trump asks : Was autopen used for Biden‘s consent for Jan 6 Committee pardons?
Aka -did senile Biden know what he was doing?No flies on @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/9Yii0GQNfb via @BreitbartNews
— Kathy Gyngell (@KathyConWom) March 18, 2025
Leavitt cleverly pointed out that many have observed cognitive issues surrounding the Biden administration. It’s a point that grows more credible every time the president stumbles through a press conference or, you know, debates former President Trump. Highlighting Biden’s apparent withdrawal from the decision-making process—dare one say *absence of mind*—just adds fuel to the fire of skepticism about how much he’s actually running the show.
In what could only be described as a case of signature identity theft, the conversation veered into whether Biden was even consulted before his name was stamped on the pardons for January 6 Committee members. Leavitt encouraged reporters to probe this oddity further, implying that if Biden’s signature was indeed used without his knowledge, it points to something downright nefarious. That could mean criminal behavior from his staff, turning the situation from a clerical error into a potential scandal.
Of course, one might wonder why CNN’s Kaitlan Collins didn’t pick up the investigative torch and run with it, but perhaps the liberal media has become too accustomed to smoothing over such lapses. After all, if the president’s signature could be flaunted around like last week’s leftovers, the American people deserve to know who’s pulling the strings in the oval—and who’s offering their signature for the state—without consent.
