Staff Reports
The attack on free speech and the blatant hypocrisy of mainstream media takes center stage once again, this time ignited by the disturbing release of a letter from would-be assassin Ryan Routh. The Biden-Harris Justice Department has made headlines by allowing this letter, which contains Routh’s chilling proclamation of a $150,000 bounty for someone to finish what he failed to do, to see the light of day. Meanwhile, former Attorney General Bill Barr has expressed his astonishment at this decision, questioning what constructive purpose it serves beyond potentially inciting more violence.
In a world where the narrative is so often controlled by left-leaning outlets, the stark contrast in responses from CNN and MSNBC regarding Routh’s menacing letter is telling. CNN, the self-proclaimed bastion of journalistic integrity, wasted no time blaring the most sensational parts of the letter on their screens, giving it the dramatic backdrop it craved. They highlighted Routh’s bounty, treating it like a breaking news special that was too enticing to resist. In the colorful world of CNN, it’s business as usual to fan the flames, especially when it comes to anything related to Donald Trump.
On the other end of the spectrum, MSNBC took a more cautious approach—perhaps even a calculated one. In an unexpected turn, the network opted not to share Routh’s deadly offer for a hit on Trump, citing a desire not to “encourage violence.” This surprising hesitation stands in stark contrast to the network’s typical programming, which often serves up a heaping plate of anti-Trump sentiment. Joy Reid, Rachel Maddow, and their colleagues typically thrive on sensationalism, yet here they were, hand-wringing over the potential for inciting chaos. One can’t help but wonder what drove this moment of restraint on their part.
Barr’s bewilderment points to a more profound issue at play—why would the DOJ reveal such a letter if not to sow division and create more chaos? With Routh admitting to an assassination attempt and lamenting his failure, it’s hard to see the release as anything but a provocation. Democrats often claim they reject violence, yet their actions seem to echo a different story. An unfiltered look at how they handle these situations reveals a complex web of contradictions, where the narrative can shift based on the political calculus of the moment.
CNN Shares Would-Be Assassin's Chilling Letter, but MSNBC Shockingly Refuses to 'Encourage' Violence https://t.co/hMbNXMTRWi
— Gene Raymond (@chewie1238) September 24, 2024
As for the letter itself, it shows a desperation and disillusionment that should concern anyone, not just those on the right. Routh’s admission of failure paired with his offer of a dollar amount raises questions about the kind of rhetoric that has infiltrated the current political landscape. It highlights a dangerous precedent: will there come a time when radicals view violence against political figures as an acceptable course of action? It’s a serious concern that everyone, regardless of political affiliation, should take seriously.
In the ongoing battle over who controls the narrative, the reactions from CNN and MSNBC represent two sides of the same coin—each driven by their biases, yet playing to their audience’s expectations. While mainstream media squares off in a game of sensationalism and denial, the American public is left to ponder: in a democracy, where does accountability lie when would-be assassins turn to written threats? The ultimate irony is that the media continues to play a pivotal role in how these issues are perceived, often choosing fear-mongering over responsible reporting.
