Staff Reports
The Biden administration is once again facing allegations of interference in the Hunter Biden investigation, despite their denials. IRS whistleblowers have emerged with compelling testimony contradicting the administration's claims. Attorney General Merrick Garland and Special Counsel David Weiss may offer a different narrative, but their statements are now being contested by a collection of meeting notes and emails from the previous year. It appears that the Biden team may need to provide some explanations.
But that's not the only revelation. Recent revelations shed light on questionable plea deals that were being crafted for President Biden's son, Hunter. It appears that various officials within the Department of Justice (DOJ) were exceedingly willing to extend leniency to Hunter Biden, raising questions about the true independence of the investigation.
In a recent testimony, Garland seemed to conveniently forget whether he had discussed the probe with anyone at the FBI. However, the whistleblowers have come forward with allegations that the investigation faced multiple limitations and hindrances. It appears that the prosecutors appointed by Biden were not particularly enthusiastic about pursuing felony charges against the president's son—a surprising turn of events, to say the least.
Even the Washington Examiner has reported that a third IRS official confirmed the roadblocks faced by David Weiss in his attempts to bring charges against Hunter Biden. Garland's denials are beginning to lose credibility. Michael Batdorf, the IRS Director of Field Operations, voiced his frustration with the Justice Department's reluctance to approve tax charges that IRS agents believed had substantial evidence. To make matters worse, agent Gary Shapley, a whistleblower, was inexplicably removed from the case at Weiss's direction. It all starts to sound like a conspiracy.
Nevertheless, Batdorf refuses to attribute these developments to politics or a scheme to protect Biden. Right. Are we supposed to believe that all of this occurred by pure coincidence? The timing of meetings between DOJ officials and Hunter Biden's defense team certainly raises suspicions. And let's not forget that Hunter's lawyers mentioned Joe Biden's name, suggesting he could be called as a witness. It's evident that there was clandestine maneuvering behind the scenes.
Fortunately, the collusion between the DOJ and the defense team has been exposed, thanks to courageous whistleblowers and a vigilant judge. While new charges have been brought against Hunter Biden, there remains skepticism about whether justice will be served. Nonetheless, he will have to appear in court next month, as his request for a video arraignment has been denied. We'll have to wait and see how this unfolds.
In the end, the entire sequence of events in this matter raises concerns about undue influence and political considerations. The Biden administration may deny these allegations, but the mounting evidence tells a different story. It's increasingly clear that they were more interested in protecting their own interests than upholding the law. This is yet another example of the need to address issues within the system.
