Staff Reports
The Democrats cling to a philosophy that could be summed up as “never waste a good crisis,” and when it comes to climate change, they appear to take that to a new level. For these alarmists, it seems the motto is actually “never miss an opportunity to shove your radical agenda down everyone’s throats.” This particular brand of hysteria is deeply entrenched in the mainstream narrative, which conveniently ignores the superstitious and nonsensical nature of the beliefs at play.
The climate activists often display a remarkable lack of self-awareness, especially when they try to redefine terms to suit their agenda. They have mastered the art of goalpost shifting, making it seem like they are always right, regardless of the outcome. Whenever their doomsday predictions fail to materialize—like the annually promised hurricane Armageddon—you can expect nothing but crickets from them. Their affinity for these fabrications speaks volumes about their intellectual capacity.
People Who Blame All Natural Disasters on Climate Change Should be Clubbed Like Baby Sealshttps://t.co/P2sUSnPbiO
— PJ Media (@PJMedia_com) January 10, 2025
A perfect exhibit of this attitude recently emerged from social media, where one retired professor, Karen Piper, found the unfortunate incident of James Woods’ home burning to be a suitable opportunity for gloating. This instance epitomizes the sheer lack of humanity that can exist in the climate fanatic community. In her posts, Piper took glee in the suffering of a well-known conservative, only to later delete her message because, naturally, the internet is forever and her insensitivity caught attention.
If these professors and activists truly cared about the environment and humanity, they would recognize that natural disasters do not require a villain like climate change to be horrific. The repeated assertions that hurricanes and wildfires are somehow the result of Anthropogenic Climate Change reflect a disconnect from reality — as if these phenomena were invented along with the automobile. The weather has always had its ups and downs, yet climate alarmists seem tragically incapable of separating natural occurrences from their political interests.
The antics of individuals like Piper illustrate a simple truth: the climate change narrative thrives on disasters, not solutions. The more chaos, the more opportunities these zealots have to preach their climate gospel. The professor’s flimsy excuse, claiming ignorance about the enormity of the wildfire situation in California, highlights a deeper problem—a profound misunderstanding of both their own rhetoric and the world around them. Instead of taking things seriously, they play the victim and deflect blame, revealing themselves as both opportunists and part of an ongoing climate grift.
Ultimately, the climate change zealots often seem less concerned about fixing the world than they are about capitalizing on the misfortune of others. They are the purveyors of incivility, using crises to bolster their personal narratives while dismissing common human decency. It’s a sad irony that they might actually be thriving on the disasters they claim to help, blind to the reality that they are a cancer on society rather than its saviors. It may be time to encourage these self-styled prophets of doom to get a real job—preferably one that results in a lighter carbon footprint for everyone else.
