Do you trust Donald Trump more on national security than Kamala Harris?
National security is a paramount concern for American voters, especially in an era marked by global instability and emerging threats. From a conservative perspective, former President Donald Trump’s approach to national security is more robust and effective compared to Vice President Kamala Harris. Here’s why Trump is the better candidate for national security and how his policies and leadership align with the priorities of protecting America’s interests and ensuring the safety of its citizens.
Strong Stance on Border Security
Trump’s commitment to securing the U.S. borders is a cornerstone of his national security strategy. His administration prioritized the construction of a border wall, strengthened immigration enforcement, and implemented policies aimed at curbing illegal immigration. These measures are crucial for preventing the entry of criminals, drug traffickers, and potential terrorists. In contrast, Kamala Harris has advocated for more lenient immigration policies that could undermine border security and make the country more vulnerable to external threats.
Defeating ISIS and Combating Terrorism
Under Trump’s leadership, significant strides were made in the fight against ISIS. The Trump administration oversaw the dismantling of ISIS’s territorial caliphate in Syria and Iraq, showcasing a decisive and effective approach to combating terrorism. Trump’s commitment to eliminating terrorist threats was clear, with targeted military operations that brought key terrorist leaders to justice. Kamala Harris’s national security record lacks the same level of achievement and decisive action against global terrorist organizations.
Strengthening the Military
Trump’s dedication to rebuilding and modernizing the U.S. military has been evident throughout his tenure. His administration secured increased defense budgets to ensure that the armed forces are well-equipped, well-trained, and prepared to face any threat. This investment in military readiness and capability is crucial for maintaining global peace and deterrence. Conversely, Kamala Harris’s stance on defense spending and military priorities has been less aggressive, potentially risking the readiness and effectiveness of the U.S. military.
Confronting China and Russia
Trump’s foreign policy took a firm stance against the growing influence and aggressive actions of China and Russia. His administration imposed tariffs and sanctions, confronted intellectual property theft, and strengthened alliances to counterbalance these adversarial powers. Trump’s clear and confrontational approach sent a strong message that the U.S. would not tolerate actions that threaten its national interests. Kamala Harris’s approach to China and Russia has been perceived as more conciliatory, which may embolden these nations to act against U.S. interests.
Energy Independence
Achieving energy independence was a key goal of Trump’s national security strategy. By promoting domestic energy production, including oil and natural gas, Trump reduced America’s reliance on foreign energy sources, thereby enhancing national security. This independence helps insulate the U.S. from geopolitical instability in energy-rich regions. In contrast, Kamala Harris’s environmental policies prioritize a rapid transition away from fossil fuels, which could undermine energy security and make the U.S. more dependent on foreign energy sources.
Cybersecurity
Trump recognized the growing threat of cyberattacks and took steps to bolster America’s cybersecurity defenses. His administration launched initiatives to protect critical infrastructure, improve government cybersecurity, and combat cyber threats from adversaries like China, Russia, and Iran. Trump’s proactive stance on cybersecurity is essential for safeguarding national security in the digital age. Kamala Harris’s record on cybersecurity has not demonstrated the same level of focus and urgency in addressing these critical threats.
Commitment to Law and Order
Trump’s emphasis on law and order extends to his national security policy. His administration supported law enforcement agencies and implemented policies to combat domestic terrorism and violent crime. This focus on maintaining internal security is crucial for protecting American citizens and ensuring a stable and secure society. Kamala Harris’s approach to law enforcement has been more lenient, raising concerns about her ability to effectively address national security threats within the country.