Staff Reports
Vice President Kamala Harris faced off against former President Donald Trump on the debate stage last night in what can only be described as a theatrical event, full of policy sparring that provided plenty of fodder for viewers. The initial focus on the economy had the crowd buzzing, with Scott Jennings, a seasoned adviser to Mitch McConnell, declaring Trump took the early lead with his well-known rhetoric on inflation and economic policies. However, that momentum waned as the debate shifted gears, particularly when immigration became the hot topic.
The debate took an electrifying turn when immigration questions were raised. Trump found himself visibly perturbed as Harris poked at his policies and previous statements, leaving him unable to regain his footing thereafter. Observers noted that while Trump appeared somewhat “agitated,” Harris maintained a calm demeanor, presenting herself as the cool-headed debater. Still, not everyone was swayed by her performance; some pointed out that despite her self-assured claims, the notion of “having a plan” does little to convince when the actual substance is lacking.
Washington Examiner: Wake up with the Washington Examiner: Trump’s disappointing debate, moderator bias, and Taylor Swift weighs in https://t.co/8DOdxRcsUp
— Ian’s Newsfeed 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@IanHNewsFeed) September 11, 2024
Harris had a penchant for announcing her supposed plans more often than not, often as empty as a politician’s promise on a campaign trail. The Vice President reiterated her idea to increase the small business tax deduction and boost the child tax credit to a whopping $6,000, but many were left wondering why these plans just arrived amidst a politically charged atmosphere. Meanwhile, when asked about the crush at the border, she dodged responsibility, trying to goad Trump instead of discussing real economic implications, suggesting that her tactics were more about mockery than clarity.
As the debate transitioned to abortion, Harris became more animated, straying into the territory that showcased her alignment with Biden’s views on the matter. In contrast, Trump was pressed rigorously about his stance, which remains somewhat murky. Having previously asserted that states should decide on abortion laws, he struggled to address whether he’d endorse a national ban, leaving the audience scratching their heads. Trump’s deflection quickly became the talk of the talk shows as he seemed not to have conferred with his running mate on the issue before making his appearance on stage.
The moderators also found themselves under fire. Critics of the debate’s structure pointed out that the hosts, David Muir and Linsey Davis, seemed to engage in fact-checking that was particularly pointed towards Trump, while Harris floated through with little scrutiny. Republican voices, including Rep. Byron Donalds, noted that the moderators leaned left—an all-too-familiar complaint from conservatives during such events. This bias was on full display when a bizarre moment unfolded regarding Trump’s comments about Haitian immigrants. The ensuing fact-check resulted in the city manager of Springfield, Ohio, denying any truth to Trump’s claims, further frustrating Trump’s supporters who witnessed yet another example of perceived unfairness in the media’s treatment of their candidate.
In a night filled with grandstanding and political theatre, the debate ultimately reflected the stark divisions in American politics. With Harris embodying a version of the left’s narrative and Trump defending his legacy, the evening concluded without any clear signals of reconciliation. Instead, it served as a reminder that the race ahead will be hard-fought, filled with the same snappy exchanges and jabs that characterized this face-off. The audience can only brace for what the next installment of this political drama will entail.
