Staff Reports
Rumors have swirled like autumn leaves as IRS whistleblowers stepped into the spotlight with claims that key government agencies, including the IRS, DOJ, and FBI, were fully aware that Hunter Biden’s now-famous laptop wasn’t just a figment of right-wing imagination. A new report from Catherine Herridge, former CBS News correspondent, relents to what conservatives have long suspected: the feds steered clear of investigating Hunter’s laptop due to the proximity of the 2020 election, thus preserving the pristine image of then-candidate Joe Biden.
According to Herridge’s investigation, IRS agents involved in Hunter’s tax scandal alleged that they were explicitly advised to avoid any inquiries that could lead back to “The Big Guy.” Yes, folks, that’s right—“The Big Guy” whose identity everyone is playing hopscotch around is Joe Biden. IRS special agent Gary Shapley pointedly noted that they faced restrictions on probing deeper as Election Day loomed larger on the horizon.
Shapley and his colleague Joseph Ziegler didn’t mince words in their revelations, highlighting the suppression of their investigative efforts. Ziegler expressed the frustration of being shackled by political interference, stating they were forbidden from asking the questions that needed to be asked, all because of the upcoming election. They were standing on a minefield of evidence while being told to play twiddly-winks instead of following the trail.
👹 FLUSH COMMIE KAMALA & TAMPON TIM WALZ 👹 JUST IN: Catherine Herridge Drops Major Report Shattering Democrats’ 2020 Laptop Narrative: https://t.co/hg5PWDbSza 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 VOTE TRUMP/VANCE 2024! 🇺🇸🇺🇸
— rightnews2023 (@rightnews2023) October 29, 2024
In a twist that would make any conspiracy theorist sit up and take notes, the whistleblowers contend that the FBI, DOJ, and IRS recognized the authenticity of the laptop as far back as late 2019. Yet, instead of pursuing this crucial lead, agents were told to zip it when it came to Joe Biden. A glaring example of double standards if there was one—evidently, scrutiny is reserved for political opponents while allies get a convenient pass.
Adding fuel to this already blazing inferno, Herridge’s report discloses that Hunter Biden’s laptop saga was described as potential “Russian disinformation” in October 2020, right before the presidential election. This dubious label, promoted by 51 former intelligence officials, served only to shield Biden’s candidacy from what could have been potential fallout—a case of election interference so brazen that it’s hard to believe it could happen in the United States.
One can hardly overlook Antony Blinken’s pivotal role as an advisor to the Biden campaign, allegedly spearheading attempts to dismiss the laptop controversy altogether. Congressional testimony suggests he waddled into the fray to orchestrate a campaign of disinformation, demonstrating just how far the establishment will go to protect its own. It’s a move straight out of the playbook for anyone who has seen political scandals unfold: distract, diminish, and deny.
While Hunter Biden received a slap on the wrist in the form of a plea deal for tax charges, it is the brave whistleblowers—Shapley and Ziegler—who are taking the heat. They claim their careers have taken a nosedive since going public, with Shapley alleging that the IRS is making life uncomfortable in hopes he’ll simply walk away. Meanwhile, they assert their true aim is to enforce impartial justice, exposing how foreign entities have enjoyed access to the Biden family through what appears to be a blatant disregard for the law.
The Biden administration’s apparent double standard raises eyebrows, especially when you draw comparisons to the aggressive tactics employed against Donald Trump. If anyone thinks the IRS might have pursued Hunter with the same zeal it reserves for political targets on the right, they might want to reconsider where those scales of justice seem to lean.
