Staff Reports
Rep. Jim Jordan, a staunch Republican from Ohio, recently engaged in a heated exchange with CNN host Dana Bash regarding the latest federal indictment of former President Donald Trump. Jordan argued that the indictment was nothing more than a desperate political attack to prevent the former President from returning to the White House in the future.
Jim Jordan Torches CNN Host over Trump Indictment: “This Is as Political as It Gets!”https://t.co/Req6WAMocr
— The Daily Fetched (@DailyFetched) June 12, 2023
Jordan pointed out that this latest attack against Trump was just part of a pattern of repeated attempts to target him over the past seven years. He warned that common sense dictated that this was just another politically motivated witch-hunt against one of the greatest Presidents in American history.
Despite Dana Bash’s insistence that the case be judged by a certain standard, Jordan cited the precedent set by Justice Harry Blackmun in Navy v. Egan. According to Jordan, the President alone had the authority to classify and control access to national security information, making this latest indictment an attempt to circumvent his lawful authority.
Bash’s frustrations were evident as Jordan refused to back down, and the two clashed over elements of the indictment. When Bash questioned whether Trump had actually declassified the materials he was accused of mishandling, Jordan argued that the former President had the right to handle them however he saw fit.
Bash’s attempts to pivot from the declassification argument and bring up the obstruction charges were quickly shut down by Jordan, who insisted that obstruction requires an underlying crime. As the two went back and forth for fifteen minutes, neither side seemed ready to back down.
Jordan’s position represents a refreshing change from the politicized media that often refuse to objectively evaluate the facts. The indictment against Trump was simply a continuation of the Democrats’ shameful attempts to discredit him. Nevertheless, Jordan’s staunch defense of Trump and the Constitution serves as a valuable reminder that the rule of law must be upheld at all times, even in the face of such heated political discourse.
