Staff Reports
Kamala Harris is set to deliver her so-called “Closing Argument” speech in Washington, D.C., an event that many are calling her last-ditch effort to sway voters as the election draws near. Scheduled for 7:30 PM Eastern, the pre-speech extravaganza is apparently already underway, leaving many wondering if it’s more of a circus than a serious political event. After all, when was the last time a Democrat’s closing argument resonated with anyone outside their bubble?
Insiders hint that Harris plans to revive her tried-and-true routine of hurling accusations at Donald Trump, who she calls “unhinged,” and misinterpreting his comments about “enemies within.” It seems that Kamala has decided to take a page from her new pal Liz Cheney’s playbook, obsessing over the events of January 6 rather than offering any genuine insight into her own policies. The irony is palpable, as it’s become clear that revisiting old grievances is all she has to offer the American people.
According to political analysts, Harris’s speech is expected to be a full-throttle, emotion-fueled tirade. She plans to assert that Trump has created an “Enemies List” of political opponents that he supposedly intends to go after in a second term. This narrative ignores the stark reality that during his first term, Trump, much to the chagrin of Democrats, refrained from exacting revenge against those who wronged him during the 2016 campaign. Harris’s approach underscores a broader Democratic tendency to fabricate narratives rather than acknowledge reality—an astonishing feat in the era of supposed accountability.
WATCH LIVE: Kamala Harris Campaign's Last Gasphttps://t.co/MsRtnDY0sO
— RedState (@RedState) October 29, 2024
The setting of her speech at the Ellipse holds its own significance. With the White House looming in the background, she aims to present herself as a competent leader. However, her choice of location ironically ties back to the lawful rally held before the events of January 6, 2021. Most Americans seem to have moved beyond that day, yet Harris remains stuck in the past, believing that rehashing these events will somehow resonate with undecided voters. It’s a blatant attempt to paint Trump supporters as dangerous without acknowledging that the overwhelming majority just want to see their voices heard in a system that often disregards them.
While Harris prepares to deliver her points, which include ridiculous claims about utilizing the U.S. military against dissenting citizens, the glaring holes in her argument become apparent. The fixation on painting an image of a vengeful Trump contrasts sharply with the actual policies that Americans care about. As voters look for candidates who offer solutions to the pressing issues of today—like inflation, crime, and border security—they are unlikely to be swayed by Harris’s melodramatic theatrics at the Ellipse.
This event is less about a closing argument and more about a desperate attempt to breathe life into a failing campaign. Viewers are encouraged to tune in for what could be a performance akin to a political stand-up act gone wrong, filled with exaggerated claims and gimmicky theatrics, proving once again that Democrats would rather play the blame game than engage in meaningful dialogue about the future of America.
