admin
A new California ballot measure named after an accused killer has sparked outrage for appearing to glorify violence. The Luigi Mangione Access to Health Care Act aims to block insurance companies from denying doctor-recommended treatments, but critics say it dangerously celebrates an alleged assassin’s actions. This comes as some on the left embrace divisive policies while claiming moral high ground on law-and-order issues.
The measure’s name honors Luigi Mangione, who allegedly murdered United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson last year. Supporters claim the proposal addresses healthcare frustrations, but naming it after a man accused of corporate assassination sends mixed messages. The initiative includes phrases like “delay” and “deny” – the same words etched on bullets found at Thompson’s crime scene. This disturbing connection makes it look like activists are rewriting a killer’s manifesto into state law.
Dr. Drew Pinsky slammed the proposal as “delusional” on Fox News’ Hannity, questioning why any serious policymaker would tie healthcare reform to a murder case. The measure’s author claims he doesn’t support Mangione’s alleged crimes, yet he deliberately used the killer’s name to capitalize on public anger. This reckless strategy prioritizes viral moments over real solutions, turning tragedy into political theater.
While the healthcare system needs reform, this proposal risks encouraging violence against business leaders. The same politicians who condemned January 6th now promote measures echoing a killer’s grievances. This hypocrisy shows radical activists will exploit any situation – even murder – to push their agenda. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders remain silent as their base romanticizes criminal behavior.
The controversy highlights double standards in crime policies. Progressives spent years condemning “right-wing extremism” while ignoring 2020’s deadly riots that caused billions in damage. Now they’re normalizing assassination rhetoric through ballot measures. This dangerous shift could alienate moderate voters ahead of critical elections.
Ironically, the measure emerges as California grapples with Prop 36 – a voter-approved initiative cracking down on theft and drug crimes. Voters clearly want tougher policing, yet radical activists push policies celebrating lawlessness. This disconnect exposes the left’s incoherent approach to public safety – decrying “systemic racism” while letting cities decay.
The Mangione measure’s backers have raised over $700,000, showing how fringe ideas gain traction through social media outrage. Young activists especially seem drawn to violent symbolism over practical reforms. If Democrats don’t reject this extremism, they risk losing Gen Z voters who want safety and stability – not chaos disguised as progress.
As the proposal enters its public comment period, Californians must decide whether to reward attention-seeking stunts or demand serious policy. Naming laws after murder suspects won’t fix healthcare – it only deepens divisions. True reform requires sober leadership, not attempts to turn killers into folk heroes.
