Staff Reports
In a recent rant on MSNBC, former White House press secretary and current liberal commentator Jen Psaki made a number of preposterous claims about conservatives and Muslims. Psaki accused conservatives and "white supremacists" of manipulating Muslim school opponents of LGBT ideology. Oh no, here comes the typical liberal strategy of demonizing anyone who disagrees with their perverted agenda.
WATCH: Jen Psaki says the GOP is 'manipulating' Muslims to oppose gender ideology.
So now she’s claiming Muslims can’t think for themselves? 🤦🏻♂️https://t.co/35nPSPP5SO
— Proud Elephant 🇺🇸🦅 (@ProudElephantUS) July 4, 2023
According to Psaki, the Republican Party is employing the same "playbook" they used to "split off Southern Whites from the Democratic Party" to recruit Muslim Americans against transgender people. Seriously? Does Psaki seriously believe that all conservatives are conspiring to turn Muslims against transgender people? Talk about a paranoid delusion.
Psaki did not stop there, however. She then characterized the opposition of the GOP to Islamic extremism as an assault on all Muslims. Contrary to Psaki's assertion, opposing Islamic extremism does not equate to assaulting all Muslims. It involves defending our nation from those who wish to do us damage. And let's not forget the "Muslim ban" falsehood she propagated, claiming that former President Trump banned Muslims from entering the United States.
Psaki omits the fact that the so-called "Muslim ban" was actually a temporary order that applied to citizens of six unstable Middle Eastern and North African nations with a high level of terrorist activity. It had nothing to do with a blanket restriction on Muslims. However, why let the truth stand in the way of propagating a false narrative?
Oh, and Psaki could not resist taking a jab at Republicans for allegedly designating Muslim Americans as the "public enemy number one" in 2011. This is merely another instance of the hackneyed liberal strategy of playing the victim card. Unsurprising coming from a party that is obsessed with identity politics.
However, the true motivation behind Psaki's tirade becomes apparent when she begins to discuss Sharia law. Psaki accuses Republicans of fear-mongering about Sharia law and giving it priority over "gun violence, climate change, and, say, millions of uninsured people."
Psaki appears to have peculiar priorities. Last time I checked, safeguarding our Constitution and the liberties of every American was incredibly crucial. Please excuse me, but gun violence and the welfare of our citizens are also worthy of consideration. However, Psaki would rather downplay the danger of Islamic extremism and portray Sharia law as an innocuous academic debate.
However, Psaki's insensitive and insulting remarks did not settle well with all. Director of the Islam and Religious Freedom Action Team Ismail Royer criticized Psaki for attempting to intimidate Muslims into embracing the liberal indoctrination of our children. He correctly noted that Muslims have the autonomy and intellect to make their own decisions, and many have rejected the agenda of the left.
In actuality, an increasing number of Muslim Americans have organized demonstrations against the teaching of gender and LGBT ideology in schools. These courageous men and women held signs and chanted in opposition to the elimination of "opt out" options for families who do not want their children to participate in sex education that conflicts with their religious beliefs.
But naturally, Psaki and her liberal allies would rather disregard these concerns and designate anyone who disagrees with their agenda as being manipulated by conservatives and "white supremacists." It is yet another instance of the left's intolerance for divergent viewpoints and refusal to engage in an honest debate.
Therefore, let us not fall for Psaki's fear-mongering and false accusations. Conservative values pose no danger to Muslims or any other group. We believe in defending our nation, the Constitution, and the liberties of every American. This includes the freedom to disagree with the liberal agenda without being labeled a zealot or manipulated by a vast plot.
