Trump’s Lawyers Slam Unfair Deadline, Cry Foul Over Judge’s Bias!

Attorneys representing former President Donald Trump are raising concerns about U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, after she gave the team just one business day to respond to an important motion. Trump’s legal team had requested a three-day extension, but Chutkan ruled that they must respond by 5 p.m. on Monday, leaving them with only one business day to review the motion.

Trump’s team expressed their frustrations in a filing, stating that the government did not allow any discussion or negotiation regarding the motion and instead demanded an immediate response. They argued that discovery in this case will be extensive and complex, and it is crucial to have structured and cooperative discussions. They criticized the government for giving ultimatums on Friday evenings before even consulting with the defense counsel, which they believe undermines the potential for a fair resolution.

Chutkan’s decision to require a response within one business day instead of the standard 14 days has raised concerns about Trump’s due process rights. Trump’s legal team highlighted how little time they were given to prepare over the weekend and expressed their dissatisfaction with the government’s delayed response to their inquiries.

This is not the first time Judge Chutkan has made her political beliefs known. Even before this case was filed, she publicly criticized Trump for allegedly directing a “violent mob” to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. She has also handed out harsh sentences to non-violent protesters from the January 6 incident.

It is troubling to see a judge show such bias and give preferential treatment to the prosecution. This raises doubts about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process. Trump deserves a fair and balanced trial, and it seems that Judge Chutkan is already leaning towards a predetermined outcome. This is a classic example of the deep-rooted bias within the judicial system that conservatives have been warning about. It is essential to question the motives and actions of a judge who allows personal political beliefs to influence her decisions.

Written by Staff Reports

Meghan Rapinoe Claims ‘Equal Pay’ as Top US Soccer Memory!

DeSantis & Wife Casey Kick Off 2024 Campaign with Must-See GOP Interview!