Staff Reports
Attorneys representing former President Donald Trump are raising concerns about U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, after she gave the team just one business day to respond to an important motion. Trump’s legal team had requested a three-day extension, but Chutkan ruled that they must respond by 5 p.m. on Monday, leaving them with only one business day to review the motion.
JUST IN: Trump's Attorneys Question Judge's Bias With Insanely Short Deadline To Respond To Key Motion….https://t.co/PN1j4vWzGj
— 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA (@JDunlap1974) August 7, 2023
Trump’s team expressed their frustrations in a filing, stating that the government did not allow any discussion or negotiation regarding the motion and instead demanded an immediate response. They argued that discovery in this case will be extensive and complex, and it is crucial to have structured and cooperative discussions. They criticized the government for giving ultimatums on Friday evenings before even consulting with the defense counsel, which they believe undermines the potential for a fair resolution.
New: Trump's legal team raises concern about Judge Chutkan: "Without doubt, the Court’s decision to vary from the default Local Rules and allow President Trump less than one business day to respond to this important Motion is a concerning development, inconsistent with his due…
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) August 7, 2023
Chutkan’s decision to require a response within one business day instead of the standard 14 days has raised concerns about Trump’s due process rights. Trump’s legal team highlighted how little time they were given to prepare over the weekend and expressed their dissatisfaction with the government’s delayed response to their inquiries.
This is not the first time Judge Chutkan has made her political beliefs known. Even before this case was filed, she publicly criticized Trump for allegedly directing a “violent mob” to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power. She has also handed out harsh sentences to non-violent protesters from the January 6 incident.
It is troubling to see a judge show such bias and give preferential treatment to the prosecution. This raises doubts about the fairness and impartiality of the legal process. Trump deserves a fair and balanced trial, and it seems that Judge Chutkan is already leaning towards a predetermined outcome. This is a classic example of the deep-rooted bias within the judicial system that conservatives have been warning about. It is essential to question the motives and actions of a judge who allows personal political beliefs to influence her decisions.
