Staff Reports
An individual recently had a light-bulb moment regarding the whole abortion debate, admitting to once being a fence-sitter on the issue. Often considered a classic case of “government skepticism,” this person, who isn’t particularly known for any hardline doctrines or pious preachings, discovered the alarming reality of those who not only defend abortion but aggressively push for it. This awakening can be traced back to the now-infamous eugenics movement pushed by Margaret Sanger—a figure who, despite being glorified by progressives, served as a dark precursor to today’s extreme pro-abortion rhetoric.
Moving from casual indifference to outright loathing of the abortion industry is easy when one starts to peel back the layers. Just last year, a co-creator of The Daily Show claimed she preferred to be labeled “pro-abortion” rather than “pro-choice,” calling abortion a “moral good.” It’s a statement that raises eyebrows—not to mention a darkly comedic image of the social justice cabal that’s turned what should be a deeply personal decision into a currency of career success. The self-styled “abortion comedian” enthusiastically informed the public about her lucrative career filled with jobs thanks to the endless flow of cash from pro-abortion groups. The sheer absurdity leaves one scratching their head but also questioning the morals of those cashing in on such a grim business.
Even voices from the left seem to be catching on, albeit in real-time confusion. Jimmy Dore, once firmly in the pro-choice camp, appears to have a dawning realization about the moral abyss beneath the flashy “women’s rights” slogans. Meanwhile, a shocking trend continues to emerge among those in power. The Colorado House Speaker recently posited a truly chilling argument: using taxpayer funds for abortions is fiscally savvy. Yes, you read that right—killing babies is now being sold as a cost-cutting measure. Any rational person would find disbelief the only appropriate reaction, but here it is, straight from a Democrat’s mouth during a legislative session.
Abortion Sophistry Reaches All-Time Psychopathic Low https://t.co/Dvuz9Dk6hZ
— Carol RN *Miss Rush & the Gipper* 👩⚕️🇺🇸 🇮🇱🦈 (@pasqueflower19) March 31, 2025
The so-called Senate Bill 183 in Colorado is tailored to normalize the abhorrent notion that state-funded abortions might just save taxpayers some cents. This bill was hastily passed after voters displayed overwhelming support for Amendment 79, which green-lit public funding for abortion services. The phrase “the savings comes from averted births” should serve as a wake-up call for all—births are now deemed an expensive inconvenience, and in a twisted calculus, a dollar saved is a life lost.
Let’s not pretend it’s an isolated case either. A parallel can be drawn to Canada, where authorities once argued that medically assisted dying, or MAID, would save health care costs. A report even suggested that those die-hard leftists could save millions by hastening death, reducing expenses in a system that’s often stretched thin. It’s worth pondering why such grim solutions are being portrayed as fiscal responsibilities instead of moral failures.
For all those still sitting on the fence, it’s time to wake up and smell the coffee. It’s long past due that this cavalcade of progressive insanity is confronted head-on, exposing the chilling reality behind the alluring façade of choice—where morality, human dignity, and fiscal prudence have become uncomfortable bedfellows in a society that’s lost its way.
