admin
A recent clip making the rounds — reposted from a Glenn Beck segment — has reignited an old but potent debate: are the “aliens” people fear today actually the same beings the Bible calls the Nephilim? The clip spotlights researcher Timothy Alberino and others who argue that passages in Genesis describe encounters with supernatural beings that modern audiences interpret as extraterrestrials.
Alberino and like-minded commentators trace a line from Genesis 6 and other ancient texts to modern UFO reports, suggesting a continuity between scriptural “watchers” and contemporary UAP sightings. Their case relies on alternative archaeology, eyewitness compilations, and a theology that reads spiritual beings into the origin stories of humanity.
The actual line in Genesis — the verse that mentions the Nephilim — is short but notoriously ambiguous, and serious scholarship offers multiple readings of what it means and whom it describes. Mainstream biblical scholars and conservative theologians alike note the uncertainty: some see “sons of God” as divine or angelic beings, others as human descendants, and some argue the Nephilim were simply legendary giants or mighty men of old.
That ambiguity matters because it exposes the intellectual stretch required to turn a poetic, ancient text into a modern, literal claim that aliens are “in” Genesis. Conservatives who care about scripture and sober reasoning should resist both sloppy literalism and fashionable dismissal; the text deserves careful exegesis, not clickbait reinterpretation.
At the same time, the national conversation about unexplained aerial phenomena has moved from late-night conjecture to congressional hearings and Pentagon reports, and the government’s own review found no verified evidence of off-world technology in the historical record it examined. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office’s public accounting emphasized misidentifications and data problems rather than any smoking-gun proof of extraterrestrial craft.
Yet those official conclusions have not ended suspicion. Recent hearings featured whistleblower-style testimony and claims that elements of the federal establishment have more information than they’ve disclosed, fueling a bipartisan demand for transparency and accountability from the executive branch. The mix of official denials and dramatic allegations has intensified distrust — a dangerous brew for a free people who depend on their institutions to tell the truth.
From a conservative vantage, there are two separate but related failures at work: the cultural elites who rush to sensationalize ancient faith for clicks, and the national-security apparatus that has too often treated taxpayers as spectators when answers are owed. Citizens of conscience should insist on honest scholarship about sacred texts and rigorous, accountable government investigations into UAPs without surrendering to hysteria or conspiratorial certainty.
Whatever one’s view on Nephilim, angels, or aliens, the proper response is steadiness — defend the integrity of Scripture, demand transparency from public institutions, and reject the easy headlines that trade truth for ratings. The country deserves sober questions and clear answers, not theatrical claims dressed up as revelation.
