admin
Carl Higbie’s latest FRONTLINE segment on Newsmax didn’t mince words, and neither should we. Responding to the ongoing assault on fair competition in women’s sports, Higbie used biting satire to underline an obvious point: if policy allows biological males to compete in female categories simply by declaring an identity, every sensible boundary protecting women and girls will soon be erased. Conservatives looking after the interests of American families should be grateful somebody on mainstream TV is willing to call this what it is — a reckless redefinition of fairness.
This isn’t about cruelty or hatred; it’s about preserving opportunities built over decades for female athletes. When biological males who have gone through male puberty enter women’s athletics, the physiological gap is real and measurable, and the consequences are not hypothetical — scholarships, championships, and the dreams of young women are on the line. Those who dismiss these concerns as “transphobia” are weaponizing language to shut down debate and sweep aside the simple truth that fair competition between biological sexes matters.
The elites who cheer this new orthodoxy pretend that sports are merely symbolic arenas for identity affirmation, but they ignore the practical fallout. Colleges, high schools, and governing bodies are caving under pressure from activist groups and woke corporations, prioritizing ideology over fairness and safety. It’s time parents, coaches, and state legislatures stop being intimidated and start defending girls’ sports with clear, biologically grounded policies.
Media outlets that present this as a marginal or “complex” issue are failing their audiences. Conservative platforms like Newsmax are stepping up to report the reality and ask common-sense questions most mainstream outlets won’t touch. Voters should demand transparency from athletic associations and insist on evidence-based rules that protect female competitors rather than erasing categories that were put in place for a reason.
Legislators have a duty to act, and many states already are — rightly — moving to safeguard girls’ athletics by requiring eligibility rules tied to biological sex or pre-transition metrics. This is about fairness, safety, and the integrity of women’s competition, not about denying anyone dignity in everyday life. Responsible conservatism supports both compassion and common sense: treat people with respect, but don’t let ideology rewrite the rules of sport overnight.
I reviewed the available reporting and the program description from Newsmax that accompanied the video clip supplied in the brief, but I was unable to locate a complete transcript or multiple independent accounts reproducing the precise phrasing beyond the segment description. That said, the core issue at stake — biological males competing in female sports and the threat that poses to fairness — is plainly evident from the discussion and the reactions it has provoked.
Hardworking Americans who care about fairness and the future of women’s sports should keep the pressure on. Speak up at school board meetings, support state-level protections, and demand that athletic organizations put science and fairness ahead of ideology. Our daughters deserve nothing less.
