Staff Reports
Joe Biden’s alleged frailties have become the worst-kept secret in Washington, and the dinosaur media is just now trying to catch up. Apparently, they’ve been so busy sleepwalking through recent history that they didn’t notice the slow-motion meltdown that was the Biden presidency until it was almost too late. The recent publication of the book “FIGHT: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House” by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes has finally brought some of this into the light—but only after the damage is done.
The authors, who somehow didn’t notice the signs of Biden’s decline while he was in office, are now rushing to reveal the extensive measures taken to cover up the obvious signs of aging. One standout moment from the book details how Congressman Eric Swalwell, known for his heated moments that may or may not involve a Chinese spy, needed to remind President Biden who he was at a picnic. At this point, one wonders if it’s time for Biden to wear a name tag. For all the swirling rumors about Biden’s mental acuity, little did anyone know they were meticulously mapping out his walking patterns with fluorescent tape.
Stop the Presses: Joe Biden Had 'Frailties' Even BEFORE That Debate! – PJ Media https://t.co/i6FT61EBzH
— Deenie (@deenie7940) April 1, 2025
Moreover, the makeup sessions he had before appearances are a revelation fitting for a 1990s sitcom. Yes, a dedicated artist was summoned to ensure that the wrinkles and weariness didn’t make an appearance before the cameras. Did the president have a “before” and “after” shot, or is that just wishful thinking? The fact that he canceled briefings because he was too busy getting his makeup done is the cherry on top of this ridiculous cake. Vanity knows no bounds, especially for those at the top of the food chain.
This book is a classic case of “better late than never,” but for Parnes and Allen, it might be more aptly titled “too little, too late.” It appears they spent the last few years tiptoeing around Biden’s obvious decline while reporting on less significant news. Their archives seem like an extended commercial break during a bad sitcom, where the punchline never arrives. Just looking back at the past eighteen months of gossip reveals nary a whisper about Biden’s slow obsolescence. It turns out, pouncing on Republicans is much more interesting than confronting the truth about the leader of the free world.
It’s hard not to wonder if this so-called media duo was playing a game of “who can be the best court jester” while claiming to be journalists. Perhaps they feared losing their cozy spots in the White House press room, so they chose to keep their heads firmly buried in the sand. Now that Biden has limped out of the Oval Office, these insiders have finally decided it’s safe to rake in some cash with a book that’s older than Biden’s last public appearance.
In conclusion, “FIGHT” is nothing but a limp attempt to cash in on a story that everyone already knew and laughed about in real-time. With a title that suggests dynamism, readers would be better off with a soggy newspaper instead. As for Biden’s next act, will the next round of media finally trickle in and keep up? Or will they remain stuck in a perpetual cycle of revelation after the fact? The whole thing is a comedy of errors, and if the press would stop waiting for the next cue to present the show, perhaps they wouldn’t look so foolish.
