Staff Reports
In the latest installment of the Democratic Party’s misadventures, Boulder, Colorado, became the unfortunate stage for an alarming event. An illegal immigrant from Egypt, named Mohamed Sabry Soliman, allegedly used a makeshift flamethrower and an incendiary device to attack peaceful demonstrators rallying in support of hostages in Gaza. This violent outburst occurred under dramatic circumstances.
How did it come to pass that Soliman was here in the first place? It appears that under the current administration, he was able to overstay his visa. Despite these violations, he managed to remain in the country, a decision that backfired dramatically. If this isn’t a call to clean up our immigration policies, what is? Soliman’s actions resonate as a stark reminder of the dangers lurking when enforcement of immigration laws becomes lax under the Democrats’ watchful eye.
The media’s initial reaction to Soliman’s rampage was also rather telling. Quick attempts were supposedly made to categorize this incident in a certain way, yet, as details emerged, it became undeniable that this was the handiwork of someone who should not have been in the country in the first place. And thus, the narrative was hurriedly reshuffled away from the glaringly inconvenient truth. Funny how that happens, right?
As the smoke clears over this horrific event, one wonders about the future of immigration control. It would seem that prioritizing border security might just prevent such tragedies from repeating. With open borders and lenient policies, who can vouch for the safety of our communities? The Democrats may have a lot to answer for as they continue to embrace a platform that seems to turn a blind eye to these pressing security concerns.
Meanwhile, in Boulder, the impact of Soliman’s attack sadly lingers on. As we hope for the recovery of his innocent victims, we should also keep in mind the bigger picture. This incident serves as a vivid reminder of how crucial it is to address immigration mishandling before it manifests in violence. Because, after all, shouldn’t the priority be safeguarding citizens over the misguided slogans and insufficient policies that allow such dangers to slip through the cracks?
