admin
Christina Bobb — a former Trump lawyer now fighting charges in Arizona’s fake-electors probe — has reportedly filed a whistleblower memorandum accusing Democratic-aligned groups and the Arizona Attorney General’s office of troubling improprieties. In the memo, Bobb says she uncovered documents showing outside organizations advising the AG and alleges payments that suggest undue influence over a politically charged prosecution.
Bobb’s complaint specifically alleges that the Democratic Attorneys General Association made two payments totaling $200,000 to Attorney General Kris Mayes’ legal fund after Mayes took office, and that a group called States United Democracy Center provided the prosecution’s roadmap. Bobb’s team says those revelations will be included in a motion seeking to disqualify Mayes, her office, and States United from continuing the case — a reasonable step if even a sliver of these claims proves true.
Independent reporting shows States United did, in fact, produce a detailed memo in July 2023 laying out potential charges and legal theories for pursuing so‑called “fake electors,” and Mayes’ office entered a letter of engagement with the group in May 2023. The discovery of that memo and the engagement letter has already raised legitimate questions about the relationship between the AG’s office and outside partisan operatives who boast Democratic connections.
Those procedural questions have real teeth: Bobb’s filing notes that courts have already found problems with how the original grand jury process unfolded and that judges have raised concerns about prosecutorial conduct and motivations in related filings. If the courts have signaled that political motivation may have tainted parts of the investigation, then every patriotic American concerned about the rule of law should want a full, transparent accounting.
Conservative commentators and outlets have loudly framed Bobb’s whistleblower memo as proof of the left’s “lawfare” playbook — weaponizing the justice system to punish political opponents while insulating partisan allies. Whether you call it corruption, influence peddling, or political theater, the optics are damning and demand immediate scrutiny from independent authorities, not spin from implicated parties.
This is bigger than any single defendant or AG; it’s about whether Americans can trust prosecutors to pursue justice rather than politics. When prosecutors cozy up to advocacy groups with obvious partisan ties, and when donors with clear political interests show up on the ledger right as prosecutions ramp up, citizens have every right to be suspicious — and to demand accountability.
Patriots who love this country and respect our Constitution should not shrug when legal institutions look compromised. Call your elected officials, demand transparency from the AG’s office, and urge the Department of Justice to review these explosive allegations thoroughly and publicly — because if the right can be targeted through lawfare, no American is safe from politicized prosecution.
