admin
Glenn Beck has it exactly right: if we want honesty in Washington, the simplest, most immediate reform is transparency — make members of Congress wear bodycams so the American people can see what they do when the cameras are off. It’s not a fanciful stunt; Beck laid out this proposal in a recent segment that went straight at the corruption of backroom deals and secret handshakes that betray voters. The idea is blunt because the rot is blunt, and patriots should demand nothing less than sunlight for those who legislate over our lives.
This isn’t untested territory — the United States Capitol Police already started a body-worn camera pilot to protect officers and the public, proving the technology works inside the Capitol complex. Congress has also seen serious legislative movement to require federal law enforcement to use cameras, showing that transparency measures are practical and increasingly bipartisan when framed around accountability. If law enforcement can be held on camera, there is no decent reason the people who vote on our laws and pocket special-interest favors should be exempt.
Even the Department of Homeland Security has moved to put body cameras on federal agents in hotspots like Minneapolis after controversial incidents exposed the gap between official narratives and reality. That step — done reluctantly by officials who once resisted broad transparency — is evidence that cameras change behavior and cut down on cover-ups. If cameras can calm volatile law enforcement encounters, imagine what they would do to the lie-filled theater of congressional maneuvering.
Let’s be honest about what this would accomplish: bodycams would end the cozy secrecy that feeds corruption, reduce the influence of lobbyists who buy access behind closed doors, and force representatives to either act like public servants or be exposed as career politicians selling influence. Conservatives who champion limited government and honest representation should lead this fight — accountability isn’t a left-right thing, it’s a pro-America thing. If members of Congress are ashamed of being recorded, perhaps they’re doing something they shouldn’t be.
Of course legitimate security and privacy concerns must be addressed — sensitive briefings and personal safety details require careful redaction and access controls, just as bills that propose body-worn cameras for federal officers specify retention and access rules. We can design a system where footage is stored securely, redacted for national-security material, and released on a schedule or under judicial oversight when it reveals misconduct. Modern transparency doesn’t mean reckless exhibitionism; it means predictable rules that favor the public interest over political cover-ups.
Watch for the hypocrisy: many lawmakers happily demand bodycams for ICE, Border Patrol, and local police — and then balk when the mirror is turned on them. That double standard is not subtle; bills and press campaigns push cameras for officers while avoiding any requirement for elected officials to accept the same light. If transparency is good for enforcement, it’s good for lawmakers, and conservatives should call out the charade and insist on one standard for all who exercise power in our capital.
Patriotic Americans should put this issue on their to-do list: demand cameras in committee rooms, on the floors of Congress, and at the doorways where deals are made. Vote for candidates who back accountability, pressure your representatives until they agree to recorded oversight, and don’t accept excuses about decorum or discomfort — the people’s business belongs to the people. The remedy Beck proposes is simple, cheap, and effective; if we want a Congress that serves rather than schemes, we’d better get willing to look.
!_
