admin
They celebrated a Lombardi Trophy on February 8, 2026 at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, but the victory lap turned into a tax horror story overnight as California’s regime quietly punished winners for doing their jobs. The Seattle Seahawks’ Super Bowl LX triumph should have been pure joy for players and fans alike — instead headlines this week focused on how the state’s tax code drained more cash from the paycheck than the game put in.
Quarterback Sam Darnold earned the standard $178,000 winner’s bonus for lifting the Lombardi, but estimates circulating in the press show California will claim roughly $249,000 from him because of its so‑called jock tax and duty‑day apportionment rules. That math is obscene: a man gives his all on the biggest stage and walks away owing tens of thousands more than he just won — an indignity that should outrage every sensible taxpayer in America.
Here’s how the racket works: California counts “duty days” — every practice, meeting and media obligation — and then apportions a slice of a player’s entire season income to the state based on those days; for the Super Bowl, teams logged roughly eight of those days in Santa Clara. That means the state doesn’t just tax the $178,000 bonus, it taxes a percentage of a multimillion‑dollar annual salary as if all that income were earned there, creating a perverse result where winning costs a player money.
The mechanics are made worse by California’s punitive tax rates at the top, which balloon what the state can take once it decides it has a claim on a slice of a star’s paycheck. Conservatives have warned for years that California’s revenue lust and complicated carve‑outs distort incentives, but you don’t need a PhD in public policy to see the smell of bad governance when an athlete pays more to a state than he earned for winning a championship.
This isn’t just a pocketbook issue for a handful of celebrities — it’s a window into how a progressive tax regime treats work and success. When state policy rewards loss and penalizes victory, it accelerates flight of talent, capital and events to lower‑tax states; every soldier, small‑business owner and factory worker who believes in being rewarded for effort should be alarmed.
The NFL and the players’ union should stop treating this as an accounting footnote and demand protections for their people, or at minimum push for game contracts and location agreements that reimburse these confiscatory levies. If national leagues will tolerate the theft of their players’ legitimate earnings by hostile state governments, then they are complicit in the very redistributionist schemes conservatives reject. No league executive should be able to sleep comfortably while one of their athletes loses money for winning a championship.
Americans who still believe in fairness, limited government and keeping more of what you earn must call out this lunacy and support policies that stop states from weaponizing events to squeeze out cash. The spectacle of a hero handing his Super Bowl bonus to the state should make clear to every voter that bad tax policy has real victims, and that the push to protect success is patriotic, moral and necessary.
