Staff Reports
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has been caught red-handed censoring Americans who dared to criticize mail-in ballots before the 2020 election. Yes, you read that right! CISA, the government agency supposedly tasked with keeping America safe from cyber threats, has been playing Big Brother and trying to control the narrative on mail-in voting. What’s more, they were fully aware of the risks associated with mail-in ballots, but they went ahead and advocated for the censorship of anyone who questioned their safety anyway. Talk about hypocrisy!
According to documents obtained by America First Legal, CISA knew darn well that there were legitimate concerns about the security of mail-in voting. They had evidence that mail-in and absentee voting were less secure than good ol’ in-person voting, and they even talked about it with the media. But instead of being transparent and addressing these concerns, they actively worked to silence anyone who dared to speak out against mail-in voting. It’s like they were saying, “How dare you question the integrity of mail-in voting! Shh, shh, just keep quiet about it.”
'Bombshell' Documents: CISA Knew Mail-In Ballot Risks But Censored Criticism of Them Before 2020 Electionhttps://t.co/hyDzAojZnm
— 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA (@JDunlap1974) February 23, 2024
In fact, CISA even relied on an accounting and consulting firm, Deloitte, to keep an eye on social media and flag any posts that pushed back against mail-in voting. They were like the online hall monitors, reporting back to CISA and patting themselves on the back for a job well done. It’s like they were saying, “Aha, gotcha! We caught you questioning mail-in voting. Now, off to detention you go!”
And get this, CISA went as far as creating a chart that outlined all the potential risks of mail-in voting. They knew there were issues with mail-in ballots, like the high number of improperly completed ballots and the shortage of personnel to process them promptly. Yet, despite all this damning evidence, CISA not only supported policies that pushed for widespread mail-in voting but also formed the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) to clamp down on anyone who dared to challenge the mail-in voting narrative. It’s like they were saying, “We don’t like your narrative, so we’re just going to pretend it doesn’t exist.”
But wait, it gets even juicier! The House Judiciary Committee and its Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government uncovered that CISA went so far as to censor entire “narratives” related to mail-in voting. Director Krebs even had the audacity to say that “narratives are narratives,” essentially brushing off the distinction between domestic and international social media activities. It’s like they were saying, “If we don’t like what you’re saying, it’s all just a bunch of narratives to us.”
And to add insult to injury, cybersecurity expert Mike Benz spilled the beans on Tucker Carlson’s show, revealing that CISA and other government-funded agencies were pre-censoring public debate around the 2020 election. They were basically given the power to decide what was legitimate criticism and what was deemed a “cyber attack” on US critical infrastructure. It’s like they were saying, “Your tweet about mail-in ballots is now a cyber attack. You’ve been classified, my friend!”
But here’s the kicker. Despite knowing all the risks and issues surrounding mail-in ballots, many states have made no-excuse mail-in voting a permanent feature of their elections. It’s like they’re just turning a blind eye to all the evidence and forging ahead with their questionable election practices. One-day elections, photographic voter IDs, and paper ballots remain the most secure way to run elections, but some states are like, “Nah, we’re just going to stick with mail-in voting, thank you very much.”
So, there you have it, folks. CISA, the supposed guardian of cybersecurity, has been caught with their hand in the cookie jar, censoring Americans and overlooking the risks of mail-in voting. It’s like they were playing the role of the referee and the player at the same time. But the truth will always come out in the end, and it’s clear as day that CISA was not playing it fair. Stay tuned for more jaw-dropping revelations, and don’t let anyone silence your voice, especially when it comes to your right to question the integrity of our elections.
