Staff Reports
In the world of news reporting, it’s often said that asking simple questions leads to the best answers. However, in the realm of CNN and its variants, the formula seems upside down. Chief among these purveyors of confused journalism is Brianna Keilar, whose persistent affliction of Trump Derangement Syndrome transforms even the simplest inquiries into convoluted traps for unsuspecting conservative guests. Instead of using her platform for genuine inquiry, Keilar’s modus operandi appears to be catching Republicans in her web of bias.
Stephen Miller has to whip out the crayons to explain how the federal government and presidential advisers work.
"I understand that even a temporary interruption in federal employment is a great crisis and catastrophe for you and CNN." pic.twitter.com/lVudki9XHe
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) February 18, 2025
Take her recent interaction with Stephen Miller, a former advisor to President Trump. In a setup that could almost be mistaken for a bad sitcom, Keilar struggled through a line of questioning that seemed to assume everyone with an “R” next to their name was an evil villain. It was almost tragicomic as she pressed Miller on Elon Musk’s alleged administration of the “DOGE” cryptocurrency, a venture she appears to know little about beyond its stock market shenanigans. In the end, Miller’s simple, straightforward responses left Keilar floundering like a fish out of water.
Miller’s response strategy was as easy as pie. Instead of engaging with the emotional nonsense that Keilar flung his way, he supplied clear facts, starting with the U.S. Constitution and breaking down the powers of the presidency. It was evident that he had to dial back to basics, illustrating that the president, not some tech billionaire, ultimately calls the shots in responsible governance. A situation reminiscent of teaching a cat to fetch, viewers couldn’t help but watch a political heavyweight take down a lightweight with sheer clarity.
As the back-and-forth heated up, it became clear that Keilar’s approach was more concerned with how to frame a ‘gotcha’ moment than actually understanding the workings of the government. Her misguided chipperness when discussing Musk’s comments about transparency only added to the cringe, as if she believed she was hosting a reality show instead of a serious news segment. Rather comically, Miller remained professional, smiling and enjoying the distrustful banter as Keilar relied on a narrative crafted from her exhaustive anxiety over anything resembling a conservative viewpoint.
The numbers don’t lie. CNN’s ratings have taken a nosedive since Keilar joined the ranks of their increasingly irrelevant lineup. Last reported, her show was barely clinging to life with viewership numbers that would make a local cable access channel proud. Comparatively, Fox News’ Sean Hannity routinely pulls in nearly three million viewers, showcasing a stark difference in audience appetite for actual news versus the sophistry that emanates from the CNN studio. The ratings debacle supports the idea that Americans are tired of biased reporting masquerading as journalism.
In the end, Keilar’s woes serve as a microcosm of mainstream media’s struggle to stay relevant in an age where informative discourse has been replaced by sensationalism. While she continues to sift through her jumble of TDS, it’s refreshing to see people like Stephen Miller cut through the noise—proving that basic answers can defeat convoluted narratives any day. What a thought: perhaps if the anchors on CNN spent less time pandering to their audience and more time understanding the issues, they wouldn’t be vying for such dismal ratings. But alas, the cycle of ignorance seems destined to repeat itself, leaving logical discourse in the dust.
