admin
The scene in the House Judiciary Committee on January 22, 2026, was less sober oversight and more left-wing spectacle when a heated exchange broke out between conservative activist Ivan Raiklin and former Metropolitan Police officer Michael Fanone during a recess in Jack Smith’s testimony. What should have been a routine break turned into a face-off that highlighted how divided and volatile our public square has become.
Video from the hearing shows Raiklin stepping forward to introduce himself, and Fanone answering with profanity before fellow former officers stepped in and escorted Fanone from the room to restore order. The moment was electric: Democrats in the room applauded Fanone as he was led out, underscoring how these hearings have become performance art for one side.
Fanone later leveled grave accusations in the moment, claiming Raiklin had threatened his family and children, an allegation that instantly ratcheted up the stakes of an already tense encounter. Whether true or exaggerated, the claim fed right into the partisan narrative being spun on the Hill, where emotion often substitutes for evidence.
Let’s be clear about who Ivan Raiklin is: a former Army reservist and Green Beret who has become an outspoken conservative activist and legal theorist on the 2020 election fight. He has been a visible presence among those who pushed alternatives to the official narrative about the election, and his military service — not the applause lines of the hearing — deserves our recognition.
Patriots watching saw a double standard in action. When a veteran shows up to observe a hearing about the weaponization of law enforcement, Democrats and the media rush to criminalize his presence while cheering a theatrical outburst from a decorated officer who once defended the Capitol. That is not impartial oversight; it is political theater dressed up as justice.
Jack Smith spent the hearing defending prosecutors’ decisions and insisting his work was above politics, even as Republicans accused him of overreach and secrecy. For conservatives who have watched the Justice Department drift into political prosecutions, this entire episode will look like more proof that the system is being bent to serve a partisan agenda rather than the rule of law.
We should honor our veterans and our law enforcement without turning them into props for whatever narrative is convenient at the moment. If Americans are serious about fair, transparent hearings, we ought to demand decorum, even-handedness, and a refusal to let partisan theater drown out facts.
This clash on January 22, 2026, was a small skirmish in a much bigger fight for the soul of our institutions. Hardworking Americans should be alarmed that a Green Beret can be treated like a troublemaker and that investigations into political opponents can feel more like a show than a search for truth. It’s time to stand up for real accountability and stop letting hearings be weaponized against half the country.
