Staff Reports
There’s been a flurry of chatter among conservative voices about the apparent family values—or rather the lack thereof—on the Biden-Harris ticket, and the stark contrast it presents against the Trump administration. While the current Vice President, Kamala Harris, fumbles through her policy initiatives, the resurgence of family-oriented policies popularized during the Trump era is hard to ignore. Harris’s approach seems more suited for a boardroom than a family living room, showing a disconnect that could have even the most liberal critics shaking their heads at the sheer ineffectiveness of her agenda.
Adding some spice to the dialogue, Senator J.D. Vance from Ohio has found himself in the crosshairs of debate after broaching the “grandmother hypothesis” during a recent podcast. While this theory might sound like something cooked up by a group of bored academics looking for tenure, it revolves around the impact that grandmothers can have on the wellbeing of children and the family unit. Vance didn’t exactly slam the door on this idea, perhaps reflecting a growing awareness that family dynamics are hardly a joke on the conservative agenda. It appears that he is recognizing that stable family structures are fundamental to a thriving society, unlike some of the more progressive models being peddled by the left.
The Debrief with Conn Carroll: Harris’s ticket policy less ‘pro-family’ https://t.co/uY6wH0daiX
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 19, 2024
Meanwhile, Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma has been receiving attention from none other than the New York Times in a profile that could use a warning label for bias. Known for his unwavering conservative stance, Lankford is depicted as one who consistently champions traditional values, rallying against the radical left’s attempts to redefine what families look like. The Left’s disdain for Lankford is palpable, and it’s as if the Times is set on painting this diligent senator in a less-than-flattering light—perhaps exposing more about their own biases than Lankford’s character.
When looking at the overall picture, there is a striking difference in priorities between the Trump ticket and the current administration. The Trump ticket was unabashedly pro-family, embracing policies that uplifted families, promoting job creation, and prioritizing economic stability. In stark contrast, the Harris-led initiatives appear to struggle even to recognize families as a fundamental societal unit, opting instead for policy sets that feel more like distractions from pressing issues facing everyday Americans.
As the political landscape continues to shift, it’s evident that conversations around family values remain paramount, especially for conservatives. The discourse delivered by voices like Conn Carroll and Sarah Bedford reveals that the path back to a family-focused agenda is only gaining momentum. While the mainstream media may twist itself into knots trying to justify the Biden administration’s stance, true conservative principles continue to shine brightly, reminding America that strong families build strong nations.
