admin
On August 3, 2025, a 19-year-old former Department of Government Efficiency staffer, Edward Coristine — known online by the nickname “Big Balls” — was violently assaulted in an attempted carjacking in Washington, D.C., suffering a broken nose and a concussion after he stepped in to protect a companion. The ugly encounter — a swarm attack in a parking garage in the nation’s capital — should have been a straightforward wake-up call about rising juvenile violence.
Instead, on October 15, 2025, two 15-year-old defendants from Hyattsville, Maryland, pleaded guilty and were handed probation rather than prison time, with one placed on house arrest and the other remanded to a youth shelter. The message from the courtroom was painfully clear to law-abiding citizens: violent youths can inflict serious harm and still avoid meaningful punishment.
The judge publicly framed the outcome as an exercise in rehabilitation over retribution, imposing monitoring and geographic restrictions but stopping short of incarceration. That philosophy might sound noble in theory, but when families, commuters, and residents see attackers walking away with probation, it fuels the sense that criminal acts carry no real consequences.
Political leaders and public figures rightly erupted at the ruling — not out of vengeance, but out of practical alarm. This was the same episode that prompted President Trump to warn of federal intervention to restore order in D.C., a reaction born of frustration with a system that treats violent juvenile offenders more like a policy problem than a public-safety threat.
Over on Gutfeld!, the panel and regular contributor Tyrus captured the honest, gut-level truth many Americans feel when he said the motivation behind attacks like this is, in effect, “we can do it and get away with it.” That blunt assessment cuts to the core of the permissive culture that now guides too many prosecutors and judges who prioritize abstract ideals over real-world deterrence.
Let’s be clear: conservative Americans are not calling for cruelty to children, but we demand accountability when juveniles commit violent acts. Rehabilitation must be real and contingent on accountability — not a consolation prize that leaves victims bleeding and communities at risk while assailants return to the streets with a slap on the wrist.
If Washington won’t protect its citizens, then federal oversight, stricter juvenile accountability, and policies that restore consequences are necessary to deter this new brand of lawlessness. Patriots across the country should stand with victims like Edward Coristine and insist that our justice system stop sending signals that violence is tolerable because the perpetrators are young.
