admin
A storm has erupted over the Trump administration’s hardline campaign against suspected narcotics traffickers after reporting revealed a September follow-up missile strike that reportedly killed survivors of an initial attack on an alleged drug-smuggling boat. The Washington Post’s reporting — which says Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a directive to “kill everybody” and that an admiral ordered the second strike — has prompted bipartisan uproar and promises of congressional oversight.
Patriots should remember why these operations began: the president inherited an unprecedented fentanyl and drug invasion choking American towns and killing our children, and he chose to confront the cartels with decisive force rather than hollow statements. The White House and conservative commentators insist these strikes are part of a concerted effort to stop poison from reaching our neighborhoods and to deny transnational criminal organizations safe havens in the Western Hemisphere.
That said, the media circus surrounding anonymous sourcing must be examined with a skeptical eye. Outlets eager to kneecap a successful anti-drug campaign have leapt from troubling unnamed claims to courtroom declarations of wrongdoing, and Republicans should not reflexively surrender to every headline crafted to damage our commanders and the president. The Guardian and other outlets have amplified the outrage, but the rush to judgment risks undermining the very operations keeping dangerous narcotics off American streets.
The administration has pushed back hard, arguing the strikes were lawful and that the men targeted were part of designated narco-terrorist networks threatening U.S. security — a legal posture the White House says was vetted by military counsel. White House press officials and the Pentagon have defended the strikes as consistent with the law of armed conflict and necessary to protect the homeland, and that defense deserves to be heard in full before partisan grandstanding takes over.
Congress has pounced, promising hearings and videos, and some lawmakers are already weaponizing the episode for political gain. There’s merit in oversight and in ensuring our forces follow the law, but what we must not allow is career politicians and liberal media figures to handcuff commanders trying to prevent drugs and chaos from pouring into America again. Americans want tough results and accountability, not kabuki theater designed to score headlines.
At the end of the day, the choice for voters should be clear: do we side with leaders willing to take bold action to defend American lives and sovereignty, or with those who would prefer press conferences and permissive borders while our communities drown in fentanyl? Demand transparency from the committees, but stand with the troops and leaders who are finally treating narco-terrorists like the mortal threat they are. Our families’ safety is not a debate to be outsourced to cynics and career politicians.
