Staff Reports
Democrats are tangled in a web of disarray that even a spider would envy, as new poll results reveal rock-bottom approval ratings for the party. With midterms looming in 2026 and a presidential race in 2028, the party is scrambling to coalesce around leaders who promise to “resist” President Trump in his second term. However, selecting radical leftists as their champions may well spell doom for the Democrats, especially as the rest of the nation appears to be leaning right.
Recent polling from trusted sources, including CNN and NBC News, paints a bleak picture for the Democratic Party. Perry Bacon Jr. of The Washington Post highlighted six Democrats he claims are leading the charge against Trump 2.0. Considering that all six are notorious left-wing figures, one has to question whether the lessons being imparted are anything but cautionary for the party’s chances in future elections. If their definition of resistance is to double down on the fringe, the Democrats will find themselves losing more voters than they’ve ever imagined.
What to Make of These Top Democrats Liberal Columnist Recommends As They Look to 'Resist' Trump?https://t.co/E0FCLxfKjD
— A.C. Spollen (@ACSpollen) March 20, 2025
The dissatisfaction among Democratic voters is tangible. Many feel that their representatives are failing to hold Trump accountable, with figures like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer depicted as weak for rolling over on budget matters. Meanwhile, California Governor Gavin Newsom is starting a podcast, inviting pro-Trump guests—exactly what the party doesn’t need to rekindle its base. This level of misalignment suggests that the Democrats are missing the boat entirely when it comes to understanding their constituents’ anger over Trump’s policies.
At the heart of the resistance, Rep. Jasmine Crockett from Texas makes headlines as Democrats’ go-to figurehead. Crockett, representing the bluest district in Texas, embraces all the hallmarks of leftist ideology, spouting anti-Trump rhetoric and dismissing her opponents with what can only be described as racially charged comments. Although she has the luxury of playing to an ultra-liberal audience, her approach is likely a lesson in what not to do for Democrats aiming to broaden their appeal beyond deep-blue enclaves.
Crockett’s well-documented antics, including walking out of Trump’s recent address to Congress, showcase how far removed she is from the moderate voters critical to winning swing states. Yet according to Bacon Jr., this brashness could resonate with angry Americans. But for those Democrats eyeing competitive districts, embracing a firebrand like Crockett will only push away moderate constituents. After all, some of them might still prefer a politician who knows how to maintain decorum instead of issuing a two-word dismissal to billionaires.
Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut joins this parade of radical Democrats, employing alarmist language that would make even the most dramatic soap opera star blush. While Democrats initially sought to portray themselves as willing to collaborate with the new Trump administration, Murphy has taken a page from the more hysterical corners of the party. He puts forth a narrative that Trump is not only a threat to democracy but a threat on par with tyranny, reinforcing the fearmongering that has become a staple of contemporary leftist politics. Comparatively, one has to wonder how he thinks such an emotional approach will sway an electorate wary of the extremes.
The list of radical Democratic figures continues with Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, showcasing their eagerness to cast themselves as champions of a deeply divided political climate. Despite polling that suggests a lack of grassroots support for their radical ideas, the Democratic Party seems undeterred. Ocasio-Cortez remains a prominent voice, with her supporters urging her to challenge Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in 2028. At this rate, Republicans should be printing campaign materials already.
Each of these Democrats exemplifies a party that is confused about its identity, using incendiary language and radical actions in a bid to energize a base that appears increasingly disillusioned with mainstream politics. Meanwhile, many are left wondering if their aggressive rhetoric will do anything other than scare away potential allies in centrist districts. If the Democrats hope to see any success in upcoming elections, they would be wise to reconsider their choice of leaders—or continue reveling in their richly deserved dysfunction.
