Staff Reports
The latest moves inside the Department of Justice reveal a disturbing new low in how the federal government handles gun rights and mental health. After a tragic shooting at a Minneapolis Catholic school allegedly committed by a transgender individual suffering from gender dysphoria, top DOJ officials are considering a nationwide ban on firearm ownership for transgender people. This shocking proposal isn’t about safety—it’s about punishing an entire class of Americans for the actions of one disturbed individual. The government wants to label transgender people as mentally ill and strip them of their Second Amendment rights, all under the guise of “public safety.” This is a dangerous, slippery slope that reeks of government overreach and discrimination.
It’s no secret that the Left and certain “conservatives” desperate to look tough on crime are quick to jump on these bandwagons when tragedy strikes. But instead of focusing on real solutions—like securing our schools, improving mental health care in a way that respects all Americans, or enforcing existing laws—they push for sweeping bans that only punish law-abiding citizens. This selective targeting of transgender individuals as some mental health “risk group” is a textbook example of government discrimination cloaked in liberal virtue signaling. If the DOJ starts denying gun rights based on gender identity, who’s next on the chopping block? It’s a dangerous first step toward eroding constitutional rights based on arbitrary labels.
🚨#BREAKING: The Department of Justice are reportedly actively considering implementing a policy that would ban transgender individuals it classifies as mentally ill from owning firearms, framing the move as a step to prevent potential acts of violence. pic.twitter.com/msCpyeL6DD
— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) September 4, 2025
Meanwhile, the political theater surrounding this tragedy only highlights the hypocrisy of the Left. The Minnesota governor, a leading Democrat, has turned his state into a “trans refuge,” signaling to the world that their radical social agenda trumps public safety concerns. Yet, when violence occurs involving a transgender person, they ignore the obvious signs and demand more gun control for everyone else. They don’t care about protecting children or communities—they care about pushing their radical ideology no matter the cost. On the other side, politicians like Vice President JD Vance are right to demand action, but banning an entire group isn’t the way. It’s a cover for liberal incompetence and a failure to confront the real issues.
The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel is poised to take a grim step by weighing a ban on transgender people owning firearms. Think about that: a federal agency choosing who gets to exercise the fundamental right to bear arms based on mental health assumptions tied to gender identity. This goes beyond common sense. It bends the Constitution into a pretzel to fit a political narrative. The Second Amendment doesn’t say “except transgender people” or “except people with certain mental health conditions.” It says the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. If the government can strip America’s freedoms from one group, it won’t be long before others face the same fate.
Americans must reject this madness before it escalates. The battle for the soul of our country is happening right now, and it’s no accident that liberal elites want to disarm and marginalize anyone who doesn’t fit their progressive mold. This isn’t about safety—it’s about control and conformity. The DOJ should focus on the real threat: violent criminals who don’t respect the law, not scapegoating a whole segment of the population. When will we say enough? When will we tell Washington that our rights aren’t up for debate or political horse-trading? Maybe instead of banning guns for certain Americans, the government should start holding the real criminals accountable—and stop using innocent lives as an excuse to chip away at freedom.
