Staff Reports
President Joe Biden’s mental acuity has been called into question once again, this time by former New York Times editor Jill Abramson. In a scathing op-ed, Abramson accused the White House press corps of aiding in a cover-up of Biden’s declining cognitive state. She criticized journalists for their reluctance to push the narrative of the president’s mental frailty, suggesting that their political biases prevented them from reporting the truth.
Abramson did not mince words, stating that it is “laughable and immoral” for Democrats to blame the press for reacting to Biden’s evident cognitive lapses. She called out journalists for failing in their duty to hold those in power accountable, emphasizing the importance of reporting the truth regardless of political implications. The former Times editor expressed concern that reporters may have shied away from the story to avoid being perceived as supporting former President Donald Trump.
Following Biden’s lackluster debate performance against Trump, a CBS News poll revealed a sharp decline in public confidence in the president’s mental fitness. Only 27% of registered voters now view Biden as mentally competent, a significant drop from previous polling. Additionally, support for Biden seeking a second term has dwindled, with concerns over his age, decision-making abilities, and record in office cited as primary reasons for opposition.
The fallout from the debate has underscored ongoing doubts about Biden’s cognitive capabilities, with the media facing scrutiny for their role in downplaying these concerns. As the public becomes increasingly aware of the president’s mental acuity issues, the pressure mounts for a more transparent and honest assessment of his fitness to lead the nation.
