admin
A new investigative report has ripped the scab off a long-buried Jan. 6 mystery, naming a former U.S. Capitol Police officer as a near‑perfect forensic match to the hoodie‑clad pipe‑bomber seen on security video the night before the Capitol breach. The analysis, which compared stride, cadence and a distinct limp, produced a startling 94 to 98 percent match, forcing Americans to ask why this explosive lead wasn’t pursued aggressively from day one.
According to multiple sources cited in the investigation, the woman identified spent years on the Capitol Police Civil Disturbance Unit before leaving mid‑2021 for a security assignment with another federal agency. Those personnel moves and the ties between law enforcement and federal security contractors are precisely the kind of tangled relationships that demand full transparency for the public to have faith in any official narrative.
The forensic work at the heart of this story used specialized gait‑analysis software that examines knee flexion, hip motion, step length and cadence to make matches when faces are obscured. Independent analysts who reviewed the comparison told reporters the combination of algorithmic results and visual inspection pushed confidence into the high‑90s, which is the sort of evidence that should have triggered immediate federal follow‑up, not whispers and obfuscation.
Even more troubling are the procedural questions surrounding the original investigation: reports about a SmarTrip card, surveillance that appeared to be conveniently limited, and claims that key witnesses and nearby neighbors were never thoroughly questioned. Those facts line up with a pattern many Americans already suspect — that powerful people can and do protect their own while the rest of us are fed a convenient story.
That same suspicion is why former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, appearing on Rob Schmitt Tonight, warned viewers that this revelation feels incomplete and that “there’s more to this than we really know right now.” His voice matters because he was on the front lines that day, and his reluctance to accept a tidy explanation should be a red flag to every lawmaker who cares about the truth.
Conservatives must not let this story be memory‑holed the way so many inconvenient pieces of the Jan. 6 puzzle have been. The Department of Justice and the FBI owe the American people straightforward answers: who was questioned, what was seized, and why were apparent leads not followed to their conclusion. If there is any doubt about motive, method or cover‑up, Congress should step in and use its subpoena power without mercy.
This is about more than one day in 2021 — it is about whether Americans can trust the institutions charged with their safety and their liberties. Patriots demand accountability, not press releases; transparency, not spin; and real investigations, not the same tired excuses. Lawmakers who swear to uphold the Constitution should treat this as the national security and public integrity crisis it plainly is, and they should act now.
