admin
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich returned to Mark Levin’s Life, Liberty & Levin to remind Americans of a lesson the Washington swamp keeps trying to forget: sometimes taking a principled stand means short-term pain and long-term victory. Gingrich recounted the 1995–96 fight over spending and the government shutdown during his speakership, and he did not mince words about the modern elites who think brinkmanship is a sign of weakness. The blunt, no-nonsense argument he laid out was pure conservative common sense — defend the taxpayers, defend the Constitution, and don’t surrender your promises to the left.
For the younger patriots who never lived through it, the 1995–96 shutdowns were not a sitcom moment but a real, costly standoff that lasted 28 days and forced Washington to face fiscal reality. The impasse followed President Clinton’s vetoes and a clash over spending priorities that the Republican House, led by Gingrich, insisted be reined in. You can sugarcoat it on cable all you want, but the historical record shows that hard bargaining, not timidity, produced the first sustained period of federal fiscal discipline in generations.
Gingrich has never been shy about the tradeoffs: he argues that the shutdown tactics were instrumental in producing the balanced-budget deals that followed and that Republicans should remember that standing firm can lead to lasting wins. He’s written and said plainly that short-term closure was preferable to becoming one more promise-breaking, Washington sellout. That is a lesson for today’s GOP — which too often forgets that surrender only invites more spending, more bureaucracy, and more power for the left.
What set Gingrich off on Levin’s show was watching modern leaders cave, make excuses, and then act surprised when the left steamrolls them anyway. He tore into the cowardice of those who claim to be conservative but recoil when the fight gets hard, even naming the 19 Senate Republicans who helped pass bills that did not rein in the spending problem. For conservatives, the anger is justified: voters sent people to Washington to fight for their future, not to placate the permanent ruling class.
Patriots should hear Gingrich’s voice as a rallying cry: don’t trade principle for a press release. The media and the swamp will scream when conservatives hold the line, but they will celebrate every time Republicans fold and hand the country over to reckless deficit-spending and centralized control. If you care about your kids’ future, about lower taxes and smaller government, standing firm — even when it’s uncomfortable — is the only honorable option.
History is not on the side of the appeasers. The 1995–96 showdown proved that tough negotiating can produce meaningful reform, and Gingrich’s blunt reminder on Levin’s show should be a wake-up call: conservatives must stop being timid and start governing like they mean it. Washington’s talkers will always prefer compromise for the sake of headlines; true leaders sacrifice headlines for results. The choice is simple and stark — courage and consequences, or cowardice and continued decline.
