Staff Reports
Greg Gutfeld delivered a scathing critique of Joe Scarborough during a recent episode of “Gutfeld!” on Fox News, aiming fire at the MSNBC host’s abrupt acknowledgment of Joe Biden’s cognitive decline. Scarborough’s comments came after he previously labeled Biden as “far beyond cogent,” dismissing any concerns regarding the president’s mental clarity, even telling doubters to take a hike if they couldn’t see the truth. Fast forward to Scarborough’s latest assessment, and it appears his memory may have taken a vacation of its own.
Scarborough revealed that he only recognized an issue with Biden’s mental acuity post-debate, claiming the debate performance was shockingly poor. Viewers watched as Biden stumbled, slurred, and finished nonsensical sentences, leading one to wonder how Scarborough’s observational skills rival those of a blindfolded dart thrower at a carnival. Instead of admitting he was wrong when he insisted Biden was in peak condition earlier, Scarborough decided to play the hindsight game—conveniently dodging the fact that Democrats had known about Biden’s struggles long before he took the stage.
🔥HOLY SMOKES: @greggutfeld ENDED Joe Scarborough's career with this takedown:
Joe Scarborough "will be remembered as the worst thing to happen to Florida since Ron Jeremy toured 'The Villages.'"
"Sorry, Joe, saying the debate was like a shocking reason for Biden's downfall.… pic.twitter.com/llWCaajkiA
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 3, 2025
Gutfeld’s response was as humorous as it was stinging. He blasted Scarborough for his sudden about-face, likening it to realizing Hunter Biden had issues only after seeing his art displayed in an upscale gallery. Amid the laughter, Gutfeld pointed out that if Scarborough had been truthful earlier about Biden’s mental state, the Democrats could have possibly found a more viable candidate to challenge Trump, rather than the equally perplexed Kamala Harris. The irony dripped like sarcasm from Gutfeld’s remarks as he suggested even Jimmy Carter might have performed better given the chance.
Gutfeld turned up the heat even more, suggesting that Scarborough’s spinning of the narrative was a sign of a much larger problem—integrity issues for the host, and for the Democrats who perhaps should have seen the writing on the wall about Biden’s capabilities long before the debate stage became a place of reckoning. The discussion turned into a roiling roast, with Gutfeld punctuating his argument by commenting on Scarborough’s track record of ridiculous defenses, making it clearer that the only thing being pushed out of the race faster than Biden’s clarity was Scarborough’s credibility.
In a world where misinformation seems to be the norm, Gutfeld’s relentless mockery serves as a reminder of the absurdity of the left’s attempts to paper over their own catastrophes. Scarborough may wish to reconsider his position in the media circus, as it appears the ringmaster of logic and reason is very much absent from his corner. With every slip of Biden’s tongue in the debates, it seems the only folks still backing him are those who find it convenient to ignore reality—proof that sometimes, truth can be stranger than fiction, especially on cable news.
