Kamala Harris is stepping up to bat for President Biden’s ambitious Supreme Court reform plans, declaring that the trust Americans have in the Supreme Court is on life support. Her passionate plea describes a “crisis of confidence” — a phrase that should resonate well with anyone who’s ever been questioned about their trust in a crumbling, apparently politicized institution.
This latest reform drive comes fresh on the heels of some significant decisions made by the Supreme Court that directly annoy left-leaning Americans, including the long-awaited reversal of Roe v. Wade. Harris seized the moment to point fingers at the 6-3 majority appointed by Republicans, suggesting that their rulings are somehow less legitimate because they don’t align with progressive ideals. Ethics scandals and what she calls questionable fairness in the court’s conduct are the red flags she waves to rally support for these reforms, though the list of scandals appears more like a buffet of perceived slights than a serious indictment.
Kamala Harris comes out in support of Biden Supreme Court reforms https://t.co/7WdtZ97Ovf
— Trump2024_no_matter_what (@TexasTrump2024) July 29, 2024
The Vice President’s reforms sound like a wish list for Democrats, dripping with the anticipation of reshaping the very foundations of America’s judicial system. She advocates for term limits for justices, claiming that applying the same ethics rules that apply to federal judges is a no-brainer. This cry for “no one above the law” raises an eyebrow, considering the consistent portrayal of the justice system as a one-stop shop for leftist grievances. Harris seems to be implying that once these reforms are enacted, justices will toe the line and start handing out rulings that align with more progressive values — a goal that raises the question of who really has the public’s best interests in mind.
Biden, in his own convoluted way of addressing the issue, chimed in to underline his decades-long experience with the judicial system, touting his time on the Judiciary Committee as a qualification for fixing the court’s alleged malfeasance. The rhetoric surrounding his authority and respect for institutions feels somewhat ironic, especially in light of the lack of respect he’s shown for the very processes he’s aiming to reform. It’s almost laughable how quickly the tune changes when things don’t swing their way.
While these proposals are labeled “popular,” it is worth noting that they come directly from the Democratic playbook aimed at building a narrative that ensures politically motivated reforms enjoy a friendly reception. The question remains whether the American public really believes restructuring the Supreme Court will restore their confidence or if it’s just another clever ploy to overhaul a system that many already feel is under siege. In the end, one thing is certain: Harris and Biden’s plans will have Americans sitting at the edge of their seats, waiting to see if they will be riding the wave of judicial reform or watching the tide come crashing down.