admin
Greg Kelly did what too few in the mainstream press will do: he pulled apart the awkward “private” Situation Room exchange Kamala Harris writes about in her new memoir and laid bare the political theater for hardworking Americans to judge. Harris’ account that Mr. Biden privately asked her — during a national security briefing, no less — whether she would be willing to take his spot if he stepped aside is not a harmless anecdote; it’s a window into a chaotic, insider-driven decision-making process that Americans deserve to understand.
According to Harris’ own telling, the exchange happened after a briefing on the failed July 13 assassination attempt on Donald Trump, with Biden allegedly “having rehearsed the speech” before posing the question to her. Harris claims she answered loyally but made clear she was ready if called upon, a moment the left will try to sanitize as camaraderie while conservatives see it as proof of the administration’s ad-hoc panic. This was not campaign banter — it was a Situation Room moment that should have been off-limits to political gamesmanship.
The memoir, titled 107 Days, is Harris’ attempt to narrate her short, chaotic sprint onto the national ticket after Mr. Biden’s withdrawal, and it reads less like humble service and more like a calculated bid for relevance. The book’s release this month has given Americans a rare, unvarnished look at the hand-wringing and finger-pointing inside the Biden camp, and voters are right to be skeptical of the spin. What the left calls “honesty” about internal disagreements, we call accountability — and Harris’s timing reeks of self-preservation.
Her book tour has only amplified the schisms she writes about, as protesters and former Biden aides publicly rebut her claims and accuse her of rewriting history to evade blame. Harris’ public distancing from Biden over Gaza and other issues on the campaign trail looks less like principled leadership and more like post-facto image management when viewed alongside these internal admissions. The American people aren’t fools; they see a party imploding and a vice president who suddenly remembers her conscience only after the election was lost.
Greg Kelly’s hard-hitting breakdown is exactly the kind of journalism conservatives want more of — he exposes the inconsistencies, the theater, and the hollow performances that Big Media tries to package as gravitas. Even outlets friendly to the left have published excerpts and pushback, showing this isn’t some partisan invention but a real story Democrats would prefer to bury. If Harris wants to rebuild credibility, she should face questions from real reporters instead of staging tearful book signings and rehearsed interviews.
We should be clear about what’s at stake: a party that keeps its private debates locked in the Situation Room yet treats the public like an afterthought is unfit to lead. Americans work hard, pay taxes, and deserve leaders who put country over career — not politicians who trot out memoirs to justify failures. That kind of accountability starts with tough reporting and relentless questioning, exactly the role Greg Kelly is doing for conservative viewers.
Patriots across the country should demand more transparency, not less. Don’t let the media’s polite spin or a glossy book rewrite the record; ask hard questions, insist on straight answers, and hold every elected official to the standard of service our families expect.
