Staff Reports
The political landscape has never been more hostile towards Donald Trump, and despite what many in the mainstream media would like to believe, it is utterly rigged against him. From the media’s incessant propaganda to a never-ending barrage of prosecutions and politically motivated investigations, it appears that the so-called “Deep State” has thrown everything but the proverbial kitchen sink at Trump. It seems only a matter of time before that too becomes part of the charade against him. This is a full-scale assault on a man who had the audacity to take on the establishment and advocate for the principles of America First.
Recent events bring this picture into sharper focus. A legal complaint was filed by American Oversight, a group known more for its partisan antics than genuine oversight, alleging that several senior officials violated the Federal Records Act due to discussions about military operations in a group chat. As if on cue, the case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg—a figure already infamous for his bias against Trump. Coincidence? Not a chance. It’s becoming increasingly problematic for any Republican, let alone a Trump-supporting one, to find justice in Boasberg’s courtroom.
In a fury that resonates with many loyal supporters, Trump has passionately denounced what he sees as another instance of political malfeasance. With a track record of “random assignments” that seem to repeatedly favor anti-Trump sentiment, Boasberg’s involvement only sparks further outrage. His claims of “massive Trump Derangement Syndrome” reverberate not just as an expression of his frustrations but as a rallying cry for anyone tired of the bias permeating the judicial system.
The System Is More Rigged Against Trump Than Ever.https://t.co/4aST9namhG
— CombsJC (@RedState66) March 28, 2025
To unravel this latest twist in the ongoing saga, credible figures like Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe have testified that the discussions in question were about nothing confidential. The Defense Department’s support for this assertion underscores the point: there is no scandal here, just a desperate push from anti-Trump factions within the government trying to create one. It’s a pattern all too familiar—when the ballot box gets them nowhere, resorting to legal harassment becomes the modus operandi.
The broader narrative playing out is not lost on the American public. More people are catching on to the coordinated efforts to undermine Trump and his America First policies. Each new legal maneuver, every “random” judge chosen, and the ongoing media frenzy only solidify the conviction that the political system is rigged—and this time, it’s glaringly obvious. What remains clear is that this relentless assault is less about the rule of law and more about silencing those who dare to stand against the establishment.
