admin
A Collin County jury has sided with Texas teen Asher Vann, awarding him roughly $3.2 million after finding that a viral, race-based social media campaign destroyed his life and reputation. The verdict is a long-overdue rebuke to the online mobs and self-appointed outrage brokers who rushed to convict a child in the court of public opinion.
What began in March 2021 as frantic Facebook posts by the mother of one of Vann’s friends exploded into national headlines, alleging that middle school boys forced another child to drink urine and shot BB guns at him during a sleepover. Those posts linked to a GoFundMe and a Change.org petition, and the fundraising effort pulled in roughly $119,000 as the allegations spread like wildfire across cable and social media.
The fallout was brutal: threats, protests, broken windows at the family home and business, and friendships and opportunities stripped away from a teenager who was never given a full and fair hearing in the initial frenzy. Vann, who was 14 at the time and is now 18, says the emotional damage lasted for years — a reminder that reputations are fragile and that public excoriation can wreck lives long before a court has its say.
At trial the jury found that the mother and her lawyer intentionally inflicted emotional distress and invaded Vann’s privacy, returning a verdict in October 2025 and prompting a late-January 2026 final judgment that upheld the award. The civil verdict forces a reckoning: media-driven accusations without rigorous verification can produce real legal and financial consequences for those who weaponize a narrative.
Conservatives should welcome this outcome not because we excuse crude teenage misbehavior, but because due process and individual rights matter — especially when the cultural elites and national newsrooms leap to exploit convenient stories. The episode also exposed how fundraising and virtue-signaling can be used to amplify unproven claims, with audits of the GoFundMe showing money was spent in ways that raise serious questions about motive and accountability.
Let this case serve as a warning: America cannot allow a perpetual outrage industry to substitute for evidence and courts. Hardworking families and kids deserve protection from smear campaigns, and we should applaud juries and judges who restore a measure of justice after the chaos of mob rule.
