Staff Reports
Kamala Harris is facing a crossroads in her political career that could be likened to a choose-your-own-adventure story, with the only problem being that it’s hard to find a happy ending. After flopping in the 2024 presidential race, the vice president is weighing her options: should she aim for the governor’s mansion in 2026, or throw her hat in the ring for another shot at the presidency in 2028? Pundits, however, are wagering that no matter which route she takes, the outcome isn’t likely to be a winner.
Much like Richard Nixon after his 1960 presidential defeat, Harris appears to be brewing a plan amid the dismal prospects of a California gubernatorial run or another presidential bid. Nixon’s own attempt to return to political glory following a loss ended with him declaring he wouldn’t be “kicked around” anymore. One might conjecture that Harris might wish to adopt the same spirit, albeit with far less gravitas, considering how her own notoriety is as deflated as a flat tire.
Kamala Harris Falls on Hard Times: ‘If She Ran for Dogcatcher, She’d Lose’ https://t.co/DqyMo8htcW
— Dan (@Deggins8) April 12, 2025
Reports indicate that Harris’s advisors are urging her to steer clear of another presidential run, with her sights instead set on the 2026 governor’s race. But let’s be honest, what is she really going to accomplish? The New York Times, which has never been shy about fluffing her feathers, suggested she is opting for the safety of California governance rather than risking another presidential flop. Yet, experienced political analysts, including some who used to be associated with the Democratic Party, hint that even a gubernatorial bid might not be as smooth as she anticipates.
The assessments from political analysts are as blunt as a butter knife. Mark Halperin and Sean Spicer shared their predictions on “The Morning Meeting,” suggesting that Harris might want to stay out of the political limelight entirely. They noted that even if she runs for governor, her track record suggests she may find herself knee-deep in electoral embarrassment. Spicer emphasized her abysmal presidential campaign, pointing to it as a glaring red flag for any future aspirations.
While disappointment isn’t always a career killer, it’s hard to ignore that Harris seems destined for more of a reality check than a victory lap. Comparison to Nixon, which might initially appear generous, ultimately highlights that she lacks the resilience he exhibited. Before she assumed the vice presidency alongside “Old Joe,” Harris boasted an aura of competence that has since collapsed under the weight of her own missteps. The more voters see and hear of Kamala Harris, the more they realize she is not the leadership material they might have hoped for.
If she does venture back into the political arena, rest assured that the mainstream media will once again drape her in praise as if she were a returning hero. However, a seasoned constituency isn’t easily swayed by wishful narratives. Harris’s ability to convince voters she has anything to offer may require more than just savvy spin from her media allies. Given the current trajectory, it looks like the only way Kamala Harris will be catching any votes is if she runs for dogcatcher—a race she might just lose, too.
