Staff Reports
Curtis Sliwa’s firm decision to remain in the New York City mayoral race is a breath of fresh air amid the liberal establishment’s desperate attempts to clear the path for their preferred candidate, Andrew Cuomo. Sliwa is the true voice for everyday New Yorkers, those who have long been ignored by career politicians and party insiders alike. His refusal to bow to the left’s pressure exposes the elitist game being played to maintain power rather than deliver real solutions.
Andrew Cuomo’s tenure as governor was marked by controversial and disastrous policies, especially the devastating handling of nursing homes during the pandemic. Yet, despite this track record, the left continues to prop him up as the supposed savior of the city, an insult to the intelligence of hard-working New Yorkers who remember the chaos his administration left behind. This is emblematic of the hypocrisy and self-serving nature of the liberal political machine that prioritizes personal and party interests over the welfare of the people.
Curtis Sliwa’s refusal to quit NYC’s mayoral race: Letters to the Editor — Oct. 25, 2025 https://t.co/icvfh5HJiv pic.twitter.com/g95qDIaXin
— NY Post Opinion (@NYPostOpinion) October 25, 2025
Sliwa’s roots as the founder of the Guardian Angels and his unwavering commitment to public safety resonate with New Yorkers tired of rising crime and ineffective governance. His grassroots approach and candid voice represent a stark contrast to Cuomo’s establishment politics. The establishment’s disdain for Sliwa isn’t about merit or vision—it’s about control. They want candidates who will adhere to their rigid ideology, not someone who dares to challenge the status quo and fight for the working class.
The liberal media’s campaign to paint Sliwa as a spoiler is predictable and transparent. They want voters to ignore the growing concerns over rampant crime, rising taxes, and government corruption that Sliwa addresses head-on. This tactic of demonizing opponents who defy the left’s narrative undermines true democratic choice and silences citizens who demand accountability and safety.
Ultimately, Sliwa’s candidacy is a rallying cry for New Yorkers who want to reclaim their city from career politicians and broken policies. For those who value honest leadership and genuine concern for public safety, Sliwa is the clear choice. His tenacity and dedication stand in stark relief against Cuomo’s legacy of mismanagement and political gamesmanship. The question for voters is simple: whose vision will build a safer, fairer New York City—the worn-out establishment or the fearless fighter from the streets?
