New Hampshire Secretary of State David Scanlan has spoken out against the 14th Amendment challenge to former President Donald Trump’s eligibility for the 2024 primary ballot. In a statement, Scanlan noted that there is no mention in New Hampshire state statute that allows a candidate to be disqualified from the primary ballot based on the 14th Amendment, which specifically addresses insurrection or rebellion. He emphasized that once a candidate meets the qualifications and follows the proper procedures, their name will appear on the ballot.
Scanlan also expressed concerns about the potential chaos and confusion that could arise if different states have different criteria for disqualifying candidates. He argued that if there is to be a constitutional disqualification, it should apply uniformly across all 50 states.
New Hampshire GOP Chairman Chris Ager echoed Scanlan’s sentiments, calling the 14th Amendment arguments a waste of time. He expressed relief that the issue has been put to rest in New Hampshire.
Liberal groups have been pushing for Trump’s disqualification based on his alleged role in the January 6th events. However, Secretaries of State, including Scanlan, have maintained that this is not within their jurisdiction.
Legal experts have also weighed in on the issue. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley argued that extending the 14th Amendment’s reference to insurrection or rebellion to unsupported claims and challenges involving election fraud would set a dangerous precedent. He pointed out that Trump has not been charged with or convicted of any actions that would disqualify him from holding office.