Linda McMahon, co-founder of World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) and veteran of the political ring, is back in the spotlight as she prepares to take on a new role in the Trump administration as education secretary. She’s not just any former wrestling mogul; she’s one whose past includes both grappling drama and significant political aspirations, making her a unique pick for the Cabinet.
At just 17, McMahon married Vince McMahon, who had big dreams of transforming his father’s wrestling business into a nationwide phenomenon. Together, they did just that, morphing the wrestling world into an American staple, coining flashy events like “Wrestlemania” that drew in millions of fans ready to cheer—or jeer—their favorite grapplers. Linda didn’t just stay backstage; she bounced into the spotlight, signing contracts, writing publications, and occasionally stepping into the ring herself. Such experiences likely give her the tough skin one might expect in high-pressure politics, although her recent legal entanglements do seem set to add some drama to her story.
What to know about Linda McMahon, Trump’s pick for education secretary https://t.co/hKdtGY4N0g
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) November 21, 2024
Her political career began in earnest when she stepped down as CEO in 2009, declaring an interest in education, a field she initially aspired to enter. Notably, her brief tenure on Connecticut’s State Board of Education didn’t quite catapult her into the thick of academic influence, and her Senate runs ended in defeat against more established Democratic candidates. Rather than fade away, McMahon decided to fund her political ambitions through hefty donations, pouring millions into various campaigns—including a hefty sum into Trump’s presidential race, a decision that certainly paid off when he appointed her to head the Small Business Administration.
Yet her political journey hasn’t been without bumps in the ring. Recent lawsuits involving former WWE employees alleging sexual abuse have put the McMahon name back in the courtroom, along with claims from former ‘Ring Boys’ about exploitation during the 1980s. While Linda’s direct involvement in these cases is questionable, it paints a picture of the chaos surrounding the wrestling empire. Critics will likely use these allegations as ammunition against her in what has already been a tumultuous career jump from wrestling to politics.
Interestingly enough, the potential of Linda’s new role in education mathematics seems light on details, particularly when considering Trump’s past promises to dismantle the Department of Education altogether. Will she usher in a new era of local control, or will she navigate the bureaucratic waters to maintain some semblance of federal oversight? One can almost hear the enthusiastic wrestling fanfare accompanying this impending showdown of policy and reform.
With Trump’s administration continually leaning on unconventional figures like McMahon, it’s clear that a new kind of political arena is at play. She might have swapped wrestling rings for conference rooms, but one thing is certain: Linda McMahon is sure to bring her unique flair from the squared circle into the intricacies of education policy. Imagine the debates in the House, complete with elbow drops and mic drops; truly, it’s politics as theater, and it promises to be anything but ordinary.