Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is once again in the crosshairs of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. Teaming up with Trump and several others, Meadows faces racketeering charges stemming from their alleged post-election antics. It’s as if Fulton County has become the latest stop on the Democratic witch hunt train, and Meadows is just the latest passenger.
In a recent legal showdown, Meadows attempted to enlist the Supreme Court in his defense, hoping they would whisk his case away to federal court. However, the Supreme Court turned him down faster than a liberal shutting down a Conservative Christmas party. His defense team argued that while serving as Chief of Staff, Meadows’ actions were under the cloak of presidential immunity. They pointed to a recent ruling by the Supreme Court indicating that presidents are generally protected from liability for their official actions, which seems like a no-brainer in a nation where the President is considered the chief executive.
Supreme Court rejects bid by former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to move his Georgia election subversion case to federal court https://t.co/SqmqjUYYGq
— CNN (@CNN) November 12, 2024
This wasn’t enough to sway the prosecutors in Fulton County, who insisted that Meadows hadn’t appropriately established that his actions were official business related to his role. They shoved back on the idea that his prosecution could open a Pandora’s box for federal officials everywhere. Maybe they’re just upset that they can’t find another florid op-ed to bolster their flimsy case – after all, the sincerity of opinion columns is a bedrock of justice, isn’t it?
After facing rejection not just from the Supreme Court, but also a U.S. district judge and the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, it appears Meadows’ predicament is getting as tangled as a set of earbuds left in a pocket. His recent cries for help from Arizona, pleading to move similar election-related charges to federal jurisdiction, landed with the same thud. The courts have spoken, and it seems they aren’t listening to the tune he’s playing.
But fear not; all is not lost for Meadows and his 15 co-defendants. The Georgia appeals court has agreed to take a look at whether Willis should be removed from the case. This drama unfolded following claims that she might have benefitted from a romantic liaison with fellow attorney Nathan Wade, making one wonder if the courtroom is now the new dating scene. The complaints were initially filed by Ashleigh Merchant, who defends another Trump associate. Looks like the soap opera in Georgia is far from over, likely to leave more twists and turns than a roller coaster designed by a cabinet manufacturer.