It seems Meghan Markle is once again looking to extend her influence, this time with a foray into the culinary world. Set to release a solo cookbook in early 2026, the Duchess of Sussex plans to bring her lifestyle brand into the realm of cooking. But there’s already controversy brewing, as some of the recipes she plans to publish appear to be far from original. Reports suggest her single skillet spaghetti bears a striking resemblance to a recipe from none other than the culinary legend, Martha Stewart.
The case of purported recipe appropriation raises not only questions about copyright infringement but also about Markle’s authenticity. Is it possible to build a cooking empire on recipes borrowed from others? Furthermore, does Markle genuinely possess the culinary prowess needed to guide the public in their kitchen endeavors, or is this venture merely another publicity ploy? As critiques surface, one wonders how much of Markle’s lifestyle brand truly reflects an understanding of the everyday person’s life.
The cookbook announcement comes amid reports of turmoil in Markle’s professional life, notably the departure of her eleventh publicist. Such turnover suggests a turbulent work environment or perhaps a mismatch between Markle’s aspirations and the realities of running a high-profile brand. While speculation abounds that she may not be the easiest employer, could it also be that the brand lacks substantial activity, making it hard for professionals to stay engaged?
Moreover, the lifestyle Markle appears to promote, featuring extravagant offerings like rainbow-themed fruit salads, is far removed from the realities of most households. While a rainbow fruit platter might make for a beautiful Instagram post, the average parent juggling school lunches and morning routines likely finds little value in such impractical advice. The question arises as to whom this cookbook is actually aimed. It seems more attuned to audiences craving celebrity affiliation rather than practical kitchen solutions.
The planned cookbook, therefore, raises pertinent questions about celebrity culture and its disconnect from everyday realities. While it’s easy for those insulated by wealth and status to live leisurely lives, Markle’s foray into lifestyle advice highlights an often-glaring gap between celebrity offerings and the average consumer’s experience. Perhaps, instead of borrowing and branding, the focus should shift to genuine, relatable connections with the audience. Whether Markle’s undertaking will successfully bridge the gap between celebrity grandeur and everyday living remains doubtful.

