admin
The Menendez brothers’ path to possible freedom took a surprising turn when their lawyer claimed gender bias could have saved them from decades behind bars. Mark Geragos declared that if the killers had been sisters, they’d “not be in custody” — a statement many conservatives call a slap in the face to victims’ rights. The remark came after a judge reduced their life sentences to 50 years to life, opening the door to parole.
The brothers murdered their parents in 1989, then lied repeatedly about the crimes. Yet defense lawyers now paint them as reformed, citing years spent mentoring inmates and working with therapy dogs. Judge Michael Jesic sided with their plea for mercy, ignoring prosecutors’ warnings about their unresolved dishonesty. Conservatives blast the ruling as proof the system cares more about criminals than justice.
Geragos argues the brothers deserve freedom after 35 years, claiming they’ve “taken full responsibility.” But court records show they’ve never fully admitted their lies, including Lyle’s attempt to coach a witness to perjure. The judge dismissed these concerns, ruling prosecutors failed to prove they’re dangers
The Menendez brothers’ path to possible freedom took a surprising turn when their lawyer claimed gender bias could have saved them from decades behind bars. Mark Geragos declared that if the killers had been sisters, they’d “not be in custody” — a statement many conservatives call a slap in the face to victims’ rights. The remark came after a judge reduced their life sentences to 50 years to life, opening the door to parole.
The brothers murdered their parents in 1989, then lied repeatedly about the crimes. Yet defense lawyers now paint them as reformed, citing years spent mentoring inmates and working with therapy dogs. Judge Michael Jesic sided with their plea for mercy, ignoring prosecutors’ warnings about their unresolved dishonesty. Conservatives blast the ruling as proof the system cares more about criminals than justice.
Geragos argues the brothers deserve freedom after 35 years, claiming they’ve “taken full responsibility.” But court records show they’ve never fully admitted their lies, including Lyle’s attempt to coach a witness to perjure. The judge dismissed these concerns, ruling prosecutors failed to prove they’re dangers. This precedent raises red flags for Americans who demand tough-on-crime policies.
The resentencing hearing featured emotional testimony from relatives begging for leniency. Cousin Anamaria Baralt pleaded for their release, saying time is “running out” to reunite them with aging family. Conservatives counter that the brothers’ “time” ran out when they pulled the trigger — twice. Sympathy shouldn’t override severe punishment for heinous crimes.
Geragos’ gender-bias claim is a red herring. The original trial’s focus was murder, not sex. Conservative voices reject the narrative that men face harsher treatment. The issue is violence, not identity politics. Manipulating gender to excuse killers undermines true equality and real justice.
The case also highlights Geragos’ controversial career. Alongside defending the Menendez brothers, he represents celebrities like Sean “Diddy” Combs. Critics argue he uses fame and media spin to skew outcomes. Conservatives warn this tactic erodes public trust in impartial justice.
Judge Jesic’s decision prioritizes “rehabilitation” over accountability. The brothers’ remorse seems shallow without full confession. Conservatives argue rehabilitation can’t erase premeditated murder. Letting them walk would send a chilling message that justice depends on wealth and privilege.
The final say rests with California’s parole board. If released, the Menendez brothers would join shockingly lenient rulings for violent offenders. Conservatives demand a justice system that protects citizens, not coddles killers. Their alarming trend must end before more families suffer.
