admin
Americans who care about honest government are rightly furious that Minnesota’s social-services gravy train was allowed to become a multiyear feeding trough for fraudsters, and yet too many in the media want to point fingers at only one community instead of the institutions that broke. For years federal dollars meant to help the disabled, elderly, and children were routed through programs that had almost no meaningful oversight, creating the perfect environment for large-scale theft. This is not small-time shoplifting; it is systemic failure that enriched middlemen and rewarded paperwork, not people.
The scale of the corruption is staggering: schemes tied to nonprofits and service providers swelled reimbursements from pocket-change projections into staggering payouts, and programs like Feeding Our Future and certain Medicaid services saw reimbursements balloon by orders of magnitude. Investigators and watchdogs now estimate losses in the hundreds of millions and possibly into the low billions, numbers that would make any sane budget hawk vomit. These aren’t the kind of accounting errors you fix with a memo — they’re evidence that the bureaucracy was gamed and that no one wanted to stop it.
It’s also a fact that a disproportionate number of the people charged in these schemes come from Minnesota’s Somali-American community, and that fact has understandably inflamed tensions and political debate. Conservatives aren’t saying entire communities are guilty, but we are demanding that criminals be held accountable regardless of their background, and that communities be protected from the reputational damage inflicted by a tiny minority of bad actors. Local leaders who pleaded ignorance while federal checks failed should be embarrassed — and investigated.
Worse, the fraud flourished in part because state systems failed when they had the chance to stop it; when suspicious patterns appeared some entities sued to keep payments flowing, and court rulings briefly forced reimbursements to continue while the rot spread. That sequence reads like a how-to manual for siphoning off taxpayer money: create the appearance of service, sue when audited, and keep the cash flowing until the prosecutors catch up. If judges and agencies kept rubber-stamping payments instead of demanding proof of service, then those officials share responsibility for enabling the theft.
Beyond the dollars, there are worrying national-security and money-laundering threads that demand sober attention, because shadowy payment networks can and have funneled money overseas through hawala systems that evade formal banking scrutiny. Some investigators say money moved through informal transfer networks has ended up in Somalia where extremist groups operate, and even if that link is not proven in court it’s a risk no responsible government should ignore. Americans can love immigrants and still insist on rigorous oversight of federal dollars and financial flows that cross borders.
Patriotic Americans should demand three things now: immediate freezes and stricter audits on any program showing explosive growth, transparency from state and federal officials who let this happen, and prosecutions that follow the evidence regardless of the political cost. If Washington and Saint Paul instead reflexively defend the system that produced these losses, voters will remember who stood between the taxpayers and the thieves. It’s time to stop the moral relativism, enforce the law, and fix the broken incentives that turned public assistance into a cash machine for fraud.
