admin
Zohran Mamdani’s rise from a little-known Assembly member to the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor is a wake-up call for the party establishment and a nightmare for ordinary New Yorkers who pay taxes and keep this city running. His upset over Andrew Cuomo in the June primary shows Democrats are drifting toward untested, radical ideas that promise the moon and deliver chaos.
Mamdani’s platform reads like a wish list for government takeover: free buses, taxpayer-funded groceries, universal childcare, a $30 minimum wage by 2030, and hefty tax hikes on the wealthy and corporations to pay for it all. These proposals sound generous until you remember there’s no magic money tree — every dollar of new spending means higher taxes, fewer jobs, and a city less friendly to business.
He’s no moderate; Mamdani has worn his Democratic Socialists of America sympathies proudly and has drawn endorsements from national left-wing icons, signaling that the Democratic Party in New York has embraced the hard-left playbook. That shift helps explain why traditional, experienced leaders are being shoved aside in favor of ideological fervor over common-sense governance.
Worse, Mamdani has a streak of controversy that should alarm every New Yorker, including troubling comments where he dodged condemning the phrase “globalize the intifada,” language many see as incitement and a direct threat to the city’s large Jewish community. Leadership means reassuring frightened communities and standing up to violent rhetoric — not parsing semantics to avoid losing support from the far left.
Beyond ideology and rhetoric, Mamdani’s resume raises real questions about competence: reports show a sparse work history and a very limited legislative track record, hardly the background one wants for the mayor of the nation’s largest city. Electing a candidate with thin experience and a paper-thin record to run a complex, cash-strapped metropolis is reckless; the consequences will be felt in safety, services, and the economy.
Democrats like to talk about being the party of results, but nominating outsiders with radical plans and shaky judgment hands Republicans a ready target and hands New Yorkers a future of higher costs and more disorder. If the party cares about holding the city and serving working families, it should rethink this flirtation with socialism and return to candidates who respect taxpayers, protect neighborhoods, and actually know how to govern.
