admin
When Attorney General Pam Bondi stepped forward to back the recent arrests tied to the Minnesota church disruption, she was reminding Americans of a basic truth: religious liberty is not a partisan talking point, it is a protected right. Conservatives should applaud an attorney general willing to enforce the law where communities of faith have been targeted, rather than shrugging as mobs treat churches like political stages. Bondi’s message — that no one is above the law — is precisely the kind of steady, principled stance this country needs from its Justice Department.
The case itself is disturbing on its face. Federal authorities say a coordinated group burst into a St. Paul church service on January 18 to confront a pastor who also serves with ICE, disrupting worship and intimidating congregants; prosecutors have since indicted several people, and former CNN anchor Don Lemon was arrested in Los Angeles in connection with the episode. The indictment alleges more than just presence — it claims planning, coordination and conduct that crossed from reporting into active participation. Those are serious accusations, and the DOJ acted after judges and grand juries reviewed the evidence.
Let’s be clear: independent reporting and vigorous journalism are indispensable in a free society, but pretending that a livestream is an automatic cloak for unlawful conduct is dangerous. The evidence prosecutors cite — including recorded planning and on-camera conduct — raises real questions about whether some media figures are increasingly choosing activism over objective reporting. Americans who pay attention to the news deserve accountability when journalists appear to be organizing or amplifying disruptive operations instead of neutrally documenting them.
The broader principle at stake here should unite anyone who believes in law and order. Churches, synagogues and mosques are supposed to be sanctuaries where families gather without fear of being ambushed by political theater. For years, the left has excused performative outrage and street theater as “protest,” even when it violates other people’s rights. Bondi’s DOJ is signaling that there are limits — and that the rule of law will protect the vulnerable from mob tactics, regardless of who the media favorites are.
Of course conservatives should also insist on due process; an indictment is not a conviction, and everyone deserves a full hearing. But insisting on legal process does not mean tolerating lawlessness disguised as journalism. If the facts alleged by prosecutors are true, then those involved must answer for plans that intentionally disrupted worship and endangered congregants. We can defend the First Amendment while also enforcing laws that preserve the safety and freedom of religious Americans.
This moment ought to be a warning to the coastal media elite: celebrity and a camera do not place you above the reach of the law. The same institutions that have spent years excusing radical tactics must now accept that ordinary Americans — especially people of faith — are entitled to the same protections as anyone else. Pam Bondi’s firm stance is the right call for conservatives who want a country where liberty is preserved by laws that apply equally to all.
Hardworking Americans who cherish worship, family and community should watch this case closely and demand accountability across the board. Support for law enforcement and for the sanctity of religious life does not make one anti-press; it makes one pro-peaceful, orderly liberty. In an age of chaos, a Justice Department that defends the quiet rights of worshippers rather than rewarding theatrical vandalism deserves our backing.
