Staff Reports
The latest showdown on “Face The Nation” between Marco Rubio and CBS host Margaret Brennan illustrates yet another chapter of the liberal media’s desperate spin. The left is in a tizzy over President Trump’s meeting with Vladimir Putin, labelling it as a cordial affair that supposedly undermines American interests. Let’s be real — if protecting American interests means avoiding global catastrophe, courtesy of a triggered war with Russia, I’m all for it. The hysteria from Democrats that Putin should have been arrested the moment he set foot on U.S. soil just screams of ignorance of geopolitical realities.
Democrats and their media lackeys, in a relentless fit, continue to paint President Trump as some kind of Russian puppet. How absurd. The reality is far more nuanced. Ukraine’s President Zelensky is set to travel to D.C., and Brennan suggests he might be bullied into agreements. It’s laughable how the narrative always assumes Trump’s administration isn’t acting in good faith. Rubio rightly dismantles this ridiculous contention, exposing it as another baseless allegation spun through the liberal lens. If European leaders are coming, it’s as partners—not chaperones.
🚨 HOLY CRAP! CBS' Margaret Brennan thought she knew more about foreign policy and the Russia-Ukraine negotiations than Marco Rubio.
She didn't. He put her in her place. Rubio is a masterclass.
"No it isn't, that's not why…That's not true…No."pic.twitter.com/ZpZASCsFYQ
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 17, 2025
For those keeping score, Trump isn’t interested in theatrical walkouts. He’s eyeing real peace talks, something the liberals with their blinders on couldn’t care less about. They’re too invested in creating a soap opera out of foreign diplomacy, forgetting it’s about the lives affected, not the headlines it makes. The groundwork for a peace agreement is being laid piece by piece, delicate as it may be. If Ukraine, European allies, and the U.S. are willing to move forward, it’s because they see promise, not peril.
The liberal outcry for immediate sanctions would ensure the sky falls on these peace efforts. The left needs to understand that diplomacy is a dance. It’s messy, involves concessions—but in the end, it’s about a glimmer of hope and life-saving agreements. The path to peace isn’t about chest-thumping rhetoric but measured steps forward.
At the end of the day, who is working towards peace? It’s certainly not the Democrats fueling division. Trump and Rubio are focused on ending bloodshed, while liberals play political chess. With every step, they’re proving who truly cares about global stability. The left’s preference for conflict over compromise brings into question their real priorities. Are they vying for peace, or just another chance to tear down a President who fights for America first?
