Staff ReportsThe recent squawking from former Biden aides and CNN’s Abby Phillip over Republican strategist Scott Jennings’ comments regarding Trump’s grant freeze is a masterclass in liberal overreaction. One might think he orchestrated a dance party during a government shutdown, but no, he merely pointed out that the frozen funds weren’t exactly going to buy Americans ice cream and puppies.
A federal judge has indeed pressed pause on Trump’s spending freeze, but Jennings daringly hinted that the average voter might have a few surprises waiting in the details of what programs were actually funded. A wandering thought one might have is: have these folks been asleep at the switch? Jennings didn’t mince words when he suggested that indeed voters might be “appalled” at how tax dollars are being spent, likening it to automatic pilot on a plane headed for a bumpy landing. It’s that delightful moment when skepticism meets reality—the IRS doesn’t have to work hard to find waste; it visits Congress daily.
NOW – Scott Jennings Torches Dems for Attacking Trump on Inherited Economy: 'Exactly Why Democrats Lost the Last Election' |@ScottJenningsKY;
"Well, first of all, I think anybody that's out making criticism about prices of anything after five days of a presidency is not… pic.twitter.com/YycQzkM3v1
— Overton (@overton_news) January 27, 2025
The left’s uproar seemed to revolve around the notion that a few people might feel the pinch from this freeze, with Phillip and her merry band – Ashley Allison and Jenna Arnold – claiming that everyday Americans were at risk. New moms losing Section 8 apartments and caregivers wringing their hands over Medicaid claims sound more like the beginning of a soap opera than a real crisis. It’s hard not to chuckle when such grand claims are made about the “real-life consequences” of government actions that many see as a necessary check on what often seems to be unchecked bureaucratic spending.
Jennings’ calm analysis contrasted sharply with the emotional barrage from Phillip and her posse. The audacity of Jennings to suggest that there needs to be a pinch of oversight in government spending has sent the left into a tizzy. Is anyone really surprised? Maybe this serves as a wake-up call that Americans, regardless of their political stripes, expect their hard-earned taxes to be handled with a tad more responsibility and transparency.
Even in the federal maze of chaos, it seems there’s a light at the end of the tunnel, as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt assured the public that direct assistance would remain untouched by the freeze. That may not quell the outrage from those who fear for their precious subsidies, but perhaps a little dose of reality is necessary in an age where political theater often overshadows basic governance.
Ultimately, the comedic irony of Jennings’ arguments is that they stem from a desire to reform a system that seems to wantonly toss taxpayer money like confetti at a wedding. As the public’s attention remains riveted on how their dollars are spent, Jennings might just be channeling the common sense many have felt was missing from Washington’s cocktail of excess. It raises questions that scream for answers, yet the left’s response feels more like a frantic grasp at power than genuine concern for the American people.
