admin
Seattle woke up this week to a nightmare for small business and common-sense governance as democratic socialist Katie Wilson was declared Seattle’s mayor-elect, a result that has left business owners and taxpayers fearing for their livelihoods. The city that once cultivated tech prosperity now faces another leftward lurch that promises higher taxes and more costly regulations—just what you don’t need when employers are already fleeing coastal blue cities. Many local entrepreneurs are telling friends and neighbors they’re worried about rent control, new levies, and the uncertain cost of running a business under a mayor who campaigned on radical change.
Wilson is a self-described democratic socialist with no prior elected office who built a name for herself as an activist and organizer, running a volunteer-driven campaign around homelessness, universal childcare, and expanded transit. She has been blunt about her lack of executive experience while promising sweeping programs that will need serious funding—programs she says will be paid for by taxing the wealthy and businesses. Voters should be under no illusion: electing activists with no track record to manage a $9 billion budget and 13,000 employees is a gamble with the livelihoods of hardworking Seattle families.
It’s not hyperbole to say local commerce is in a panic; the Seattle Chamber and business leaders are publicly anxious about what a Wilson administration could mean for jobs, investment, and already strained supply chains. For years Seattle’s progressive experiments—high minimum wages, stringent tenant rules, and complex business taxes—have driven up costs and driven out employers; now a new mayor who campaigned on even broader redistributive schemes is pushing nervous business owners to the brink. These are the real-world consequences of progressive romanticism: fewer jobs, higher prices, and fewer options for working Americans who just want to raise a family and keep their doors open.
The mechanics of the race should also sober anyone who believes in transparent outcomes: incumbent Bruce Harrell led early returns, but later mail-in ballots shifted the race dramatically in Wilson’s favor, and Harrell ultimately conceded. That razor-thin finish underscores how fragile political control can be when activist coalitions turn out in force at the right moment, and it leaves many Seattleites uneasy about the mandate for such sweeping change. Managing the city’s books, public safety, and services isn’t a social media truth-telling exercise—it requires competence and experience that activists rarely possess.
Wilson’s policy wishlist—city-run grocery stores, possible local capital gains levies, and a host of new entitlements—reads like a blueprint for higher taxes and more bureaucratic control over daily life. Promises to “Trump-proof” the city and shield it from federal policy debates might play well at rallies, but they translate into legal fights, uncertain funding streams, and a climate that repels investment and growth. If Seattle repeats the mistakes of other blue strongholds, residents will pay in higher prices, slower emergency response, and fewer opportunities for their kids.
Conservatives and business leaders in Washington must treat this as a wake-up call: when Democrats nominate activists with no governing record, it becomes the responsibility of taxpayers and sensible electeds to push back with pragmatism and clear alternatives. Rally support for pro-growth policies, highlight the hypothetical and real costs of socialist experiments, and organize to protect small businesses that are the backbone of our communities. Seattle’s future should belong to the hardworking men and women who earn it, not to a political class that chases virtue-signaling votes at the expense of prosperity.
